The feasibility of early physical activity in intensive care unit patients: a prospective observational one-center study
- PMID: 20406506
The feasibility of early physical activity in intensive care unit patients: a prospective observational one-center study
Abstract
Background: Prolonged immobilization may harm intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and early mobilization has been proposed to counteract that process. We describe our experience in early rehabilitation of ICU patients, and its effects on physiologic outcomes.
Methods: We included all patients who stayed in our 14-bed medical ICU for > or = 7 days and received invasive mechanical ventilation for > or = 2 days. The rehabilitation program included chair-sitting, tilting-up (with arms supported or unsupported), and walking. We collected vital signs before and after each intervention.
Results: Over a 5-month period we studied 20 patients, after a median ICU stay of 5 days. A contraindication to the intervention was present on 230 days (43%). Sedation (15%), shock (11%), and renal support (9%) were the most frequent contraindications. We obtained complete data from 275 of 424 interventions, 33% of which were performed during mechanical ventilation. The chair-sitting intervention was the most frequent (56%), followed by the tilting-up-with-arms-unsupported intervention (25%), the walking intervention (11%), and the tilting-up arms-supported intervention (8%). The chair-sitting intervention was associated with a significant (P = .03) decline in both heart rate (mean -3.5 beats/min, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.5 to -0.4 beats/min) and respiratory rate (-1.4 breaths/min, 95% CI -2.6 to 0.1 breaths/min), whereas blood oxygen saturation (measured via pulse oximetry [S(pO(2))]) and mean arterial blood pressure did not change significantly. Heart rate and respiratory rate similarly increased with tilting-up: 14.6 beats/min, 95% CI 10.8 to 18.4 beats/min, and 5.5 breaths/min, 95% CI 3.6 to 7.3 breaths/min with arms unsupported, and 12.4 beats/min, 95% CI 7.0 to 17.9 beats/min and 2.6 breaths/min, 95% CI -0.4 to 5.7 breaths/min with arms supported). Heart rate and respiratory rate also increased with the walking intervention: 6.9 beats/min, 95% CI 2.6 to 11.1 beats/min, and 5.9 breaths/min, 95% CI 3.8 to 8.0 breaths/min. The walking intervention significantly decreased S(pO(2)). An adverse event occurred in 13 (3%) of 424 interventions, but none had harmful consequences.
Conclusions: Early rehabilitation is feasible and safe in patients in the ICU for longer than 1 week. The chair-sitting intervention was associated with nonsignificant oxygenation improvement. The tilting-up intervention was an effort as intense as walking.
Comment in
-
Early activity in the ICU: beyond safety and feasibility.Respir Care. 2010 Apr;55(4):481-4. Respir Care. 2010. PMID: 20406518 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Early physical medicine and rehabilitation for patients with acute respiratory failure: a quality improvement project.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Apr;91(4):536-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010. PMID: 20382284
-
Early intensive care unit mobility therapy in the treatment of acute respiratory failure.Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):2238-43. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318180b90e. Crit Care Med. 2008. PMID: 18596631 Clinical Trial.
-
Survival analysis of 314 episodes of sepsis in medical intensive care unit in university hospital: impact of intensive care unit performance and antimicrobial therapy.Croat Med J. 2006 Jun;47(3):385-97. Croat Med J. 2006. PMID: 16758516 Free PMC article.
-
[Safety criteria for early goal-oriented rehabilition exercise in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit: a systematic review].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Jan;31(1):91-97. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.01.018. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019. PMID: 30707876 Chinese.
-
Safety and Feasibility of Physical Rehabilitation and Active Mobilization in Patients Requiring Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Systematic Review.Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):e1112-e1120. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004526. Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 33001619
Cited by
-
The Safety and Effect of Early Mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit According to Cancellation Criteria.Prog Rehabil Med. 2020 Jul 29;5:20200016. doi: 10.2490/prm.20200016. eCollection 2020. Prog Rehabil Med. 2020. PMID: 32844129 Free PMC article.
-
Physical therapy in the intensive care unit in a patient with biventricular assist device.Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2011 Sep;22(3):31-4. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2011. PMID: 21886478 Free PMC article.
-
[Influence of nurses on the experience of noninvasive ventilation].Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2021 Nov;116(8):702-707. doi: 10.1007/s00063-021-00836-x. Epub 2021 Jun 30. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2021. PMID: 34191044 Review. German.
-
Early mobilisation in intensive care units in Australia and Scotland: a prospective, observational cohort study examining mobilisation practises and barriers.Crit Care. 2015 Sep 14;19(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1033-3. Crit Care. 2015. PMID: 26370550 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiorespiratory response to early rehabilitation in critically ill adults: A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.PLoS One. 2022 Feb 3;17(2):e0262779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262779. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35113899 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.