Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May 20;28(15):2635-40.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.2443. Epub 2010 Apr 20.

Ethics of mandatory research biopsy for correlative end points within clinical trials in oncology

Affiliations

Ethics of mandatory research biopsy for correlative end points within clinical trials in oncology

Jeffrey Peppercorn et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Clinical investigators in oncology are increasingly interested in using molecular analysis of cancer tissue to understand the biologic bases of response or resistance to novel interventions and to develop prognostic and predictive biomarkers that will guide clinical decision making. Some scientific questions of this nature can only be addressed, or may best be addressed, through the conduct of a clinical trial in which research biopsies are obtained from all participants. However, trial designs with mandatory research biopsies have raised ethical concerns related to the risk of harm to participants, the adequacy of voluntary informed consent, and the potential for misunderstanding among research participants when access to an experimental intervention is linked to the requirement to undergo a research biopsy. In consideration of the ethical and scientific issues at stake in this debate, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Ethics Committee proposes guidelines for clinical trials involving mandatory research biopsies. Any cancer clinical trial that requires research biopsies of participants must be well designed to address the scientific question, obtain the biopsy in a way that minimizes risk, and ensure that research participants are fully informed of the risks, rationale, and requirements of the study, as well as of treatment alternatives. Further guidelines and discussions of this issue are specified in this position paper. We feel that if these principles are respected, an informed adult with cancer can both understand and voluntarily consent to participation in a clinical trial involving mandatory research biopsy for scientific end points.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A Siegel R Ward E, etal: Cancer statistics, 2008 CA Cancer J Clin 58:71–96,2008 - PubMed
    1. O'Brien SG Guilhot F Larson RA, etal: Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia N Engl J Med 348:994–1004,2003 - PubMed
    1. Slamon DJ Leyland-Jones B Shak S, etal: Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2 N Engl J Med 344:783–792,2001 - PubMed
    1. Karapetis CS Khambata-Ford S Jonker DJ, etal: K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer N Engl J Med 359:1757–1765,2008 - PubMed
    1. Allegra CJ Jessup JM Somerfield MR, etal: American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: Testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy J Clin Oncol 27:2091–2096,2009 - PubMed

Publication types