Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr 21;303(15):1490-7.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.449.

Caloric sweetener consumption and dyslipidemia among US adults

Affiliations

Caloric sweetener consumption and dyslipidemia among US adults

Jean A Welsh et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Context: Dietary carbohydrates have been associated with dyslipidemia, a lipid profile known to increase cardiovascular disease risk. Added sugars (caloric sweeteners used as ingredients in processed or prepared foods) are an increasing and potentially modifiable component in the US diet. No known studies have examined the association between the consumption of added sugars and lipid measures.

Objective: To assess the association between consumption of added sugars and blood lipid levels in US adults.

Design, setting, and participants: Cross-sectional study among US adults (n = 6113) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2006. Respondents were grouped by intake of added sugars using limits specified in dietary recommendations (< 5% [reference group], 5%-<10%, 10%-<17.5%, 17.5%-<25%, and > or = 25% of total calories). Linear regression was used to estimate adjusted mean lipid levels. Logistic regression was used to determine adjusted odds ratios of dyslipidemia. Interactions between added sugars and sex were evaluated.

Main outcome measures: Adjusted mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), geometric mean triglycerides, and mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and adjusted odds ratios of dyslipidemia, including low HDL-C levels (< 40 mg/dL for men; < 50 mg/dL for women), high triglyceride levels (> or = 150 mg/dL), high LDL-C levels (> or = 130 mg/dL), or high ratio of triglycerides to HDL-C (> 3.8). Results were weighted to be representative of the US population.

Results: A mean of 15.8% of consumed calories was from added sugars. Among participants consuming less than 5%, 5% to less than 17.5%, 17.5% to less than 25%, and 25% or greater of total energy as added sugars, adjusted mean HDL-C levels were, respectively, 58.7, 57.5, 53.7, 51.0, and 47.7 mg/dL (P < .001 for linear trend), geometric mean triglyceride levels were 105, 102, 111, 113, and 114 mg/dL (P < .001 for linear trend), and LDL-C levels modified by sex were 116, 115, 118, 121, and 123 mg/dL among women (P = .047 for linear trend). There were no significant trends in LDL-C levels among men. Among higher consumers (> or = 10% added sugars) the odds of low HDL-C levels were 50% to more than 300% greater compared with the reference group (< 5% added sugars).

Conclusion: In this study, there was a statistically significant correlation between dietary added sugars and blood lipid levels among US adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Multivariable-Adjusted Mean HDL-C Levels by Level of Added Sugar Intake Among US Adults, NHANES 1999–2006
Participants grouped by percentage of total energy intake from added sugar; <5% comprises the reference group. P<.001 for linear trend. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. HDL-C indicates high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. To convert values to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259. The 3 highest categories (10–<17.5, 17.5–<25, and ≥25) were significantly lower than the referent group (P<.001).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Multivariable-Adjusted Geometric Mean Triglyceride Levels by Level of Added Sugar Intake Among US Adults, NHANES 1999–2006
Participants grouped by percentage of total energy intake from added sugar; <5% comprises the reference group. P=.02 for linear trend. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. NHANES indicates National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. To convert values to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0113. The categories 10–<17.5 and 17.5–<25 were significantly higher than the referent group at P<.05, and the category ≥25 was significantly higher at P<.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Multivariable-Adjusted Mean LDL-C Levels by Level of Added Sugar Intake Among US Men and Women, NHANES 1999–2006
Participants grouped by percentage of total energy intake from added sugar; <5% comprises the reference group. Linear trend: P=.047 (women) and P=.17 (men). Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. LDL-C indicates low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. To convert values to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259.

References

    1. Stanhope KL, Havel PJ. Fructose consumption: considerations for future research on its effects on adipose distribution, lipid metabolism, and insulin sensitivity in humans. J Nutr. 2009;139(6):1236S–1241S. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report. Circulation. 2002;106(25):3143–3421. - PubMed
    1. Krebs-Smith SM. Choose beverages and foods to moderate your intake of sugars: measurement requires quantification. J Nutr. 2001;131(2S-1):527S–535S. - PubMed
    1. Dietary guidelines for Americans. 6. US Department of Health & Human Services; Jan2005. [Accessed October 16, 2009]. Web site. http://www.healthierus.gov/dietaryguidelines.
    1. Sugars in our diet. European Food Information Council (EUFIC); [Accessed October 12, 2009]. Web site. http://www.eufic.org/page/en/nutrition/sugar.

Publication types

Substances