Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation
- PMID: 20407059
- PMCID: PMC3073449
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.451
Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation
Abstract
Context: Cochlear implantation is a surgical alternative to traditional amplification (hearing aids) that can facilitate spoken language development in young children with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).
Objective: To prospectively assess spoken language acquisition following cochlear implantation in young children.
Design, setting, and participants: Prospective, longitudinal, and multidimensional assessment of spoken language development over a 3-year period in children who underwent cochlear implantation before 5 years of age (n = 188) from 6 US centers and hearing children of similar ages (n = 97) from 2 preschools recruited between November 2002 and December 2004. Follow-up completed between November 2005 and May 2008.
Main outcome measures: Performance on measures of spoken language comprehension and expression (Reynell Developmental Language Scales).
Results: Children undergoing cochlear implantation showed greater improvement in spoken language performance (10.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6-11.2 points per year in comprehension; 8.4; 95% CI, 7.8-9.0 in expression) than would be predicted by their preimplantation baseline scores (5.4; 95% CI, 4.1-6.7, comprehension; 5.8; 95% CI, 4.6-7.0, expression), although mean scores were not restored to age-appropriate levels after 3 years. Younger age at cochlear implantation was associated with significantly steeper rate increases in comprehension (1.1; 95% CI, 0.5-1.7 points per year younger) and expression (1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5 points per year younger). Similarly, each 1-year shorter history of hearing deficit was associated with steeper rate increases in comprehension (0.8; 95% CI, 0.2-1.2 points per year shorter) and expression (0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-1.0 points per year shorter). In multivariable analyses, greater residual hearing prior to cochlear implantation, higher ratings of parent-child interactions, and higher socioeconomic status were associated with greater rates of improvement in comprehension and expression.
Conclusion: The use of cochlear implants in young children was associated with better spoken language learning than would be predicted from their preimplantation scores.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Rapid Increases in Children's Spontaneous and Responsive Speech Vocalizations Following Cochlear Implantation: Implications for Spoken Language Development.Ear Hear. 2025 Jul-Aug 01;46(4):1029-1043. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001646. Epub 2025 Jun 16. Ear Hear. 2025. PMID: 40257853
-
Effects of early auditory experience on the spoken language of deaf children at 3 years of age.Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):286-98. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215973.76912.c6. Ear Hear. 2006. PMID: 16672797 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of pediatric bilateral cochlear implantation on language development.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Jan;166(1):28-34. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.748. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012. PMID: 22213747
-
Factors influencing spoken language outcomes in children following early cochlear implantation.Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;64:50-65. doi: 10.1159/000094644. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16891836 Review.
-
Language outcomes after cochlear implantation.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;45(1):173-85. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2011.08.024. Epub 2011 Oct 19. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012. PMID: 22115689 Review.
Cited by
-
Advances in Inner Ear Therapeutics for Hearing Loss in Children.Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2020 Sep;8(3):285-294. doi: 10.1007/s40136-020-00300-y. Epub 2020 Jul 6. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2020. PMID: 36090148 Free PMC article.
-
Representativeness in studies of early cochlear implantation.Am Ann Deaf. 2012 Summer;157(3):249-50. doi: 10.1353/aad.2012.1624. Am Ann Deaf. 2012. PMID: 22978200 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comparisons of social competence in young children with and without hearing loss: a dynamic systems framework.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015 Apr;20(2):115-24. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enu040. Epub 2014 Dec 10. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015. PMID: 25583707 Free PMC article.
-
Acoustic temporal modulation detection in normal-hearing and cochlear implanted listeners: effects of hearing mechanism and development.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Jun;16(3):389-99. doi: 10.1007/s10162-014-0499-z. Epub 2015 Mar 20. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 25790949 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability and validity assessment of a survey: Measuring satisfaction with cochlear implant rehabilitation services for children in Jordan.PLoS One. 2023 Dec 18;18(12):e0295939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295939. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38109288 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bradham T, Jones J. Cochlear implant candidacy in the United States: prevalence in children 12 months to 6 years of age. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(7):1023–1028. - PubMed
-
- Niparko JK. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation. JAMA. 2004;291(19):2378–2380. - PubMed
-
- Dettman SJ, Pinder D, Briggs RJ, Dowell RC, Leigh JR. Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant younger than 12 months: risks versus benefits. Ear Hear. 2007;28(2 Suppl):11S–18S. - PubMed
-
- Geers A, Tobey E, Moog J, Brenner C. Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in the preschool years: from elementary grades to high school. Int J Audiol. 2008;47 (Suppl 2):S21–S30. - PubMed