Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;22(3):332-8.
doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328338da83.

Emerging technologies for pediatric and adult trauma care

Affiliations

Emerging technologies for pediatric and adult trauma care

Steven L Moulton et al. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Current Emergency Medical Service protocols rely on provider-directed care for evaluation, management and triage of injured patients from the field to a trauma center. New methods to quickly diagnose, support and coordinate the movement of trauma patients from the field to the most appropriate trauma center are in development. These methods will enhance trauma care and promote trauma system development.

Recent findings: Recent advances in machine learning, statistical methods, device integration and wireless communication are giving rise to new methods for vital sign data analysis and a new generation of transport monitors. These monitors will collect and synchronize exponentially growing amounts of vital sign data with electronic patient care information. The application of advanced statistical methods to these complex clinical data sets has the potential to reveal many important physiological relationships and treatment effects.

Summary: Several emerging technologies are converging to yield a new generation of smart sensors and tightly integrated transport monitors. These technologies will assist prehospital providers in quickly identifying and triaging the most severely injured children and adults to the most appropriate trauma centers. They will enable the development of real-time clinical support systems of increasing complexity, able to provide timelier, more cost-effective, autonomous care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The figure on the left shows actual LBNP (solid line) versus beat-to-beat predicted LBNP level (dots) during a live test. The figure on the right figure shows actual LBNP (line) versus predicted LBNP level (dots) at which the subject will decompensate.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American College of Surgeons. Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient: 2006. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2006. - PubMed
    1. Sasser SM, Hunt RC, Sullivent EE, Wald MM, Mitchko J, Jurkovich GJ, Henry MC, Salomone JP, Wang SC, Galli RL, Cooper A, Brown LH, Sattin RW National Expert Panel on Field Triage, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guidelines for field triage of injured patients. Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009 Jan 23;58(RR-1):1–35. * This is a recent review of the Field Triage Criteria developed by the ACS.

    1. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:366–378. - PubMed
    1. West JG, Trunkey DD, Lim RC. Systems of trauma care. A study of two counties. Arch Surg. 1979;114:455–460. - PubMed
    1. Cales RH. Trauma mortality in Orange County: the effect of implementation of a regional trauma system. Ann Emerg Med. 1984;13:1–10. - PubMed

Publication types