Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan-Feb;125 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):72-82.
doi: 10.1177/00333549101250S110.

Male circumcision in the United States for the prevention of HIV infection and other adverse health outcomes: report from a CDC consultation

Affiliations

Male circumcision in the United States for the prevention of HIV infection and other adverse health outcomes: report from a CDC consultation

Dawn K Smith et al. Public Health Rep. 2010 Jan-Feb.

Erratum in

  • Public Health Rep. 2010 Jul-Aug;125(4):517

Abstract

In April 2007, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) held a two-day consultation with a broad spectrum of stakeholders to obtain input on the potential role of male circumcision (MC) in preventing transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the U.S. Working groups summarized data and discussed issues about the use of MC for prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with women, men who have sex with men (MSM), and newborn males. Consultants suggested that (1) sufficient evidence exists to propose that heterosexually active males be informed about the significant but partial efficacy of MC in reducing risk for HIV acquisition and be provided with affordable access to voluntary, high-quality surgical and risk-reduction counseling services; (2) information about the potential health benefits and risks of MC should be presented to parents considering infant circumcision, and financial barriers to accessing MC should be removed; and (3) insufficient data exist about the impact (if any) of MC on HIV acquisition by MSM, and additional research is warranted. If MC is recommended as a public health method, information will be required on its acceptability and uptake. Especially critical will be efforts to understand how to develop effective, culturally appropriate public health messages to mitigate increases in sexual risk behavior among men, both those already circumcised and those who may elect MC to reduce their risk of acquiring HIV.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World Health Organization and UNAIDS. New data on male circumcision and HIV prevention: policy and programme implications. [cited 2007 Nov 8]. Available from: URL: http://www.unaids.org/en/Policies/HIV_Prevention/Male_circumcision.asp.
    1. Sullivan PS, Kilmarx PH, Peterman TA, Taylor AW, Nakashima AK, Kamb ML, et al. Male circumcision for prevention of HIV transmission: what the new data mean for HIV prevention in the United States. [cited 2007 Nov 8];PLoS Med. 2007 4:e223. Also available from: URL: http://medicineplosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.13.... - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alanis MC, Lucidi RS. Neonatal circumcision: a review of the world's oldest and most controversial operation. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004;59:379–95. - PubMed
    1. Schoen EJ, Colby CJ, Ray GT. Newborn circumcision decreases incidence and costs of urinary tract infections during the first year of life. Pediatrics. 2000;105(4 Part 1):789–93. - PubMed
    1. Weiss HA, Thomas SL, Munabi SK, Hayes RJ. Male circumcision and risk of syphilis, chancroid, and genital herpes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82:101–9. discussion 110. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types