Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr 21:10:30.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-30.

How to improve medical education website design

Affiliations

How to improve medical education website design

Stephen D Sisson et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: The Internet provides a means of disseminating medical education curricula, allowing institutions to share educational resources. Much of what is published online is poorly planned, does not meet learners' needs, or is out of date.

Discussion: Applying principles of curriculum development, adult learning theory and educational website design may result in improved online educational resources. Key steps in developing and implementing an education website include: 1) Follow established principles of curriculum development; 2) Perform a needs assessment and repeat the needs assessment regularly after curriculum implementation; 3) Include in the needs assessment targeted learners, educators, institutions, and society; 4) Use principles of adult learning and behavioral theory when developing content and website function; 5) Design the website and curriculum to demonstrate educational effectiveness at an individual and programmatic level; 6) Include a mechanism for sustaining website operations and updating content over a long period of time.

Summary: Interactive, online education programs are effective for medical training, but require planning, implementation, and maintenance that follow established principles of curriculum development, adult learning, and behavioral theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Module navigation page. Learner selects module from list of topics on welcome page, which directs to module navigation page. Module topic is displayed on module navigation page (1). Modules are stuctured with both program control and learner control. To start a module, the learner must complete the pretest (2), which then activates the didactics section (3). The learner may complete didactics in the order of his/her choosing. The post test is then activated once all objectives of didactics are complete. Links to references may be accessed at any time (4). Completion of the entire module enables the learner to print the didactics section or a module summary, or have the summary emailed to their address (5). Website navigation includes access to other modules (6) or the current module (7). Tabs at the top of the page (8) access the main menu or individual test results. Learners can also post messages and communicate with other learners in a Forums section (i.e. "chat rooms"). Administrators at each training program have additional tabs (8) to access trainee and performance results, and to schedule modules according to their needs. The webmaster and curriculum editors have an additional administrative tab to approve/delete registrants and training programs, as well as upload educational content.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Main Results page. Pretest and post test performance is calculated as modules are completed and can be accessed by administrators at each participating program. Performance on each item is calculated (1) along with item discrimination (2). Results may be drilled down to include frequency of incorrect answers on each item. Cronbach's alpha is calculated on each pretest and post test (3). Results can also be viewed by year of training (4). A feedback section displays learner ratings on the instructive value of the module, and individual comments on how to improve the module can be accessed (5). For statistical calculations, individual scores grouped by year of training can be accessed (6). Performance may be drilled down for each training program (7), although each training program can view only their scores and aggregate scores of all participating programs. Performance on prior years can also be accessed (8).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harden RM, Hart IR. An international virtual medical school (IVIMEDS): the future for medical education? Med Teacher. 2002;24:261–7. doi: 10.1080/01421590220141008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kern DE, Thomas PA, Howard DM, Bass EB. Curriculum development for medical education: A six-step approach. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore; 1998.
    1. Fordis M, King JE, Ballantyne CM, Jones PH, Schneider KH, Spann SJ, Greenberg SB, Greisinger AJ. Comparison of the instructional efficacy of Internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294:1043–51. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.9.1043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: Sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med. 2002;77:S86–S93. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200210001-00028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. US Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC. United States Department of Education; 2009. http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalrepo...

LinkOut - more resources