Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis
- PMID: 20409499
- PMCID: PMC2946825
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.021
Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis
Abstract
Background: Barriers experienced by patients influence the uptake of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Prior research has quantified how often patients encounter these challenges but has generally not revealed their complex perspective and experience with barriers.
Purpose: This mixed-methods study was conducted to understand current perspectives on CRC screening.
Methods: A two-part, mixed-methods study was conducted of primary care patients recruited from Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network practices. First, in June-July 2005 a survey was mailed to 660 patients aged 50-75 years posing an open-ended question about "the most important barrier" to CRC screening. Second, beginning in October 2005, seven gender- and largely race-specific focus groups involving 40 patients aged 45-75 years were conducted. Beginning in October 2005, survey verbatim responses were coded and quantitatively analyzed and focus group transcripts were qualitatively analyzed.
Results: Responses to the open-ended survey question, answered by 74% of respondents, identified fear and the bowel preparation as the most important barriers to screening. Only 1.6% of responses cited the absence of physician advice. Focus group participants cited similar issues and other previously reported barriers, but their remarks exposed the intricacies of complex barriers, such as fear, lack of information, time, the role of physicians, and access to care. Participants also cited barriers that have little documentation in the literature, such as low self-worth, "para-sexual" sensitivities, fatalism, negative past experiences with testing, and skepticism about the financial motivation behind screening recommendations.
Conclusions: Mixed-methods analysis helps to disaggregate the complex nuances that influence patient behavior. In the present study, patients explained the web of influences on knowledge, motivation, and ability to undergo CRC screening, which clinicians and policymakers should consider in designing interventions to increase the level of screening.
2010 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening.Am J Prev Med. 2010 May;38(5):499-507. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.020. Epub 2010 Mar 28. Am J Prev Med. 2010. PMID: 20347555 Free PMC article.
-
Physician and staff perceptions of barriers to colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.Cancer Control. 2007 Apr;14(2):167-75. doi: 10.1177/107327480701400210. Cancer Control. 2007. PMID: 17387302
-
Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and barriers to participation of colorectal cancer screening tests in the Asia-Pacific region: a multicenter study.Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jul;76(1):126-35. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.168. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22726471
-
Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.Public Health. 2021 Jan;190:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.10.025. Epub 2020 Dec 21. Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33360029
-
Addition of Financial Incentives to Mailed Outreach for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2122581. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22581. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34432010 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Gastroenterologists' perceived barriers to optimal pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation: results of a national survey.J Cancer Educ. 2012 Jun;27(3):526-32. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0364-x. J Cancer Educ. 2012. PMID: 22528638 Free PMC article.
-
Overview of the National Cancer Screening Program for Colorectal Cancer in Korea over 14 Years (2004-2017).Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;55(3):910-917. doi: 10.4143/crt.2022.1432. Epub 2023 Mar 8. Cancer Res Treat. 2023. PMID: 36915246 Free PMC article.
-
The Black Panther, Masculinity Barriers to Medical Care, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Intention Among Unscreened American Indian/Alaska Native, Black, and White Men.Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 6;10:814596. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.814596. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35462819 Free PMC article.
-
Public stated preferences and predicted uptake for genome-based colorectal cancer screening.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Mar 19;14:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-18. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014. PMID: 24642027 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling.BMC Microbiol. 2021 Jan 14;21(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-02080-3. BMC Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33446094 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(2):71–96. - PubMed
-
- Levin B, Lieberman D, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1570–95. - PubMed
-
-
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008 2008 Nov 4;149(9):627–37. Epub 2008 Oct 6. Summary for patients in: Ann Intern Med 2008 Nov 4;149(9):1–44.
-
-
- CDC Use of colorectal cancer tests—U.S., 2002, 2004, 2006. MMWR. 2008;57(10):253–8. - PubMed
-
- Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(19):1406–22. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
