Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;115(5):910-917.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d9f629.

Incidence and risk factors for amniotic-fluid embolism

Marian Knight  1 , Derek Tuffnell, Peter Brocklehurst, Patsy Spark, Jennifer J Kurinczuk; UK Obstetric Surveillance System
Affiliations

Incidence and risk factors for amniotic-fluid embolism

Marian Knight et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the incidence of amniotic-fluid embolism and to describe risk factors, management, and outcomes.

Methods: Through a population-based cohort study and nested case-control analysis, using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System, we identified 60 women in the United Kingdom who had an amniotic-fluid embolism between February 2005 and February 2009 and 1,227 women for the control group. We investigated the potential factors underlying amniotic-fluid embolism using an exploratory logistic regression analysis to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Sixty cases of amniotic-fluid embolism were reported, an estimated incidence of 2.0 per 100,000 deliveries (95% CI 1.5-2.5). Amniotic-fluid embolism occurrence was significantly associated with induction of labor (adjusted OR 3.86, 95% CI 2.04-7.31) and multiple pregnancy (adjusted OR 10.9, 95% CI 2.81-42.7); an increased risk also was noted in older, ethnic-minority women (adjusted OR 9.85, 95% CI 3.57-27.2). Cesarean delivery was associated with postnatal amniotic-fluid embolism (adjusted OR 8.84, 95% CI 3.70-21.1). Twelve women died (case fatality 20%, 95% CI 11-32%); 5 of 37 newborns of women with antenatal amniotic-fluid embolism died (perinatal mortality 135 per 1,000 total births, 95% CI 45-288). Women who died were significantly more likely to be from ethnic-minority groups (adjusted OR 11.8, 95% CI 1.40-99.5).

Conclusion: High-quality supportive care can result in good maternal outcomes after amniotic-fluid embolism. Clinicians should consider both the risks and benefits of induction and cesarean delivery because more restricted use may result in a decrease in the number of women suffering a potentially fatal amniotic-fluid embolism. The observed increased risk of fatality in ethnic-minority women may be associated with differences in underlying medical conditions or access to care, and clinicians should that ensure appropriate services are provided to minimize this risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lewis GE, editor. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving mothers lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer 2003–2005. London (UK): CEMACH; 2007.
    1. Sullivan E, Hall B, King J. Maternal deaths in Australia 2003–2005. Canberra (Australia): Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2008.
    1. Abenhaim HA, Azoulay L, Kramer MS, Leduc L. Incidence and risk factors of amniotic fluid embolisms: a population-based study on 3 million births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:49.e1–8.
    1. Kramer MS, Rouleau J, Baskett TF, Joseph KS. Amniotic-fluid embolism and medical induction of labour: a retrospective, population-based cohort study. Lancet 2006;368:1444–8.
    1. Tuffnell DJ. United Kingdom Amniotic Fluid Embolism Register. BJOG 2005;112:1625–9.

Publication types