Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 Dec;46(4):517-23.
Epub 2010 Apr 23.

Mirror neurons: action observation treatment as a tool in stroke rehabilitation

Affiliations
  • PMID: 20414184
Free article
Multicenter Study

Mirror neurons: action observation treatment as a tool in stroke rehabilitation

M Franceschini et al. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Background: The observation of actions performed by others activate in an observer the same neural structures (including mirror neurons) as when he/she actually performs the same actions.

Aim: The aim of the present study was to assess whether action observation treatment may improve upper limb motor impairment in chronic stroke patients.

Design: This was an observational study.

Setting: Patients were recruited by three Italian Centres for Neurorehabilitation between 2006 and 2008.

Population: Twenty-eight chronic stroke patients with upper limb impairment have undergone for four weeks, five days a week, a rehabilitation treatment based on observation of video-clips presenting hand daily actions, followed by the imitation of those same actions with the affected limb.

Methods: Functional evaluation by means of Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Frenchay Arm Test (FAT) and Fugl Meyer (FM) was carried out twice before treatment (BT1 and BT2), at an interval of 15 days, then after treatment (AT1) and finally at a two-month follow-up (AT2). Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was applied to test differences between scores obtained from functional scales before and after treatment (BT1 vs. BT2; BT2 vs. AT1; AT1 vs. AT2).

Results: In all scales, scores did not differ when comparing BT1 with BT2. Scores improved significantly in all scales at AT1 as compared to BT2 (MBI, P=0.026; FAT, P=0.005; FM, P=0.001). This improvement was still present at the two-month follow-up as testified by no score difference between AT1 and AT2.

Conclusion: Action Observation Treatment may become a useful strategy in the rehabilitation of stroke patients.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: The present preliminary study suggests that stimulation of neural structures (including mirror neurons), activated when the patients actually perform the same actions as those observed could constitute a good alternative rehabilitative approach in chronic stroke patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types