An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods
- PMID: 20416411
- DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60059-5
An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods
Abstract
Statement of problem: Plaque control is essential for the prevention of inflammatory periodontal disease. Ultrasonic scaling and hand scaling have been shown to be effective for the removal of plaque. However, routine periodontal prophylactic procedures may alter the surface profile of restorative materials.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess in vitro the changes in roughness of zirconia surfaces treated by various scaling procedures.
Material and methods: One hundred forty identical disks (10 mm in diameter, 2 mm thick) were made. The specimens were divided into 7 groups of 20 each; the surfaces of the specimens were exposed to different types of scaling methods simulating standard clinical conditions. In the control group (C), no scaling procedures were performed; in the other groups, a steel curette (SC), a plastic curette (PC), a titanium curette (TC), a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler (PUS), an ultrasonic scaler (US), and a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler (MUS) were used. The surface texture was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively with a profilometer and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). A 1-way ANOVA was performed to assess whether roughness profile (Ra) differed among groups, while pairwise comparisons between groups were evaluated by the Tukey HSD test (alpha=.05).
Results: The 1-way ANOVA revealed significant differences among groups (P<.001); the Tukey HSD test demonstrated that all methods achieved different results. Analysis of zirconia surfaces treated by different ultrasonic scaling systems demonstrated some deeper scratches, whereas zirconia instrumented with various types of periodontal curettes exhibited smaller scratches. Scaling with a steel curette produced the least alteration of zirconia surfaces.
Conclusions: All instrument types evaluated altered the smoothness of zirconia surfaces. Follow-up in vivo studies are indicated to assess potential clinical problems associated with increased roughness at the margin of zirconia restorations following routine dental prophylaxis.
Similar articles
-
An In Vitro Evaluation of Alumina, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Surface Roughness Caused by Two Scaling Instruments.J Prosthodont. 2017 Feb;26(2):129-135. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12424. Epub 2015 Dec 18. J Prosthodont. 2017. PMID: 26683122
-
An investigation of the effect of scaling-induced surface roughness on bacterial adhesion in common fixed dental restorative materials.J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1265-70. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 May 13. J Prosthet Dent. 2014. PMID: 24831748
-
The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Sep;100(3):194-202. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60178-X. J Prosthet Dent. 2008. PMID: 18762031
-
Implant surface alterations from a nonmetallic ultrasonic tip.J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr. 1998;46(3):69-73. J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr. 1998. PMID: 10597152 Review.
-
Effects on the Titanium Implant Surface by Different Hygiene Instrumentations: A Narrative Review.Cureus. 2022 Oct 30;14(10):e30884. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30884. eCollection 2022 Oct. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36465763 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of repeated ultrasonic instrumentation on single-unit crowns: a laboratory study.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):3189-3201. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04301-z. Epub 2021 Nov 24. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 34820725
-
Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Porcelain Fused to Metal and Stainless-Steel Crown Following Ultrasonic and Hand Scaling: A Comparative Study.Cureus. 2022 Jul 22;14(7):e27134. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27134. eCollection 2022 Jul. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36017283 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of physical decontamination methods on zirconia implant surfaces: a systematic review.J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021 Oct;51(5):298-315. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2005080254. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021. PMID: 34713992 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of physical decontamination methods on zirconia implant surface and subsequent bacterial adhesion: An in-vitro study.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Feb;8(1):313-321. doi: 10.1002/cre2.486. Epub 2021 Oct 2. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022. PMID: 34599862 Free PMC article.
-
Maxillary cement retained implant supported monolithic zirconia prosthesis in a full mouth rehabilitation: a clinical report.J Adv Prosthodont. 2013 May;5(2):209-17. doi: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.209. Epub 2013 May 30. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013. PMID: 23755349 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials