Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;79(7):515-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Apr 24.

An analysis of clinical queries in an electronic health record search utility

Affiliations

An analysis of clinical queries in an electronic health record search utility

Karthik Natarajan et al. Int J Med Inform. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: While search engines have become nearly ubiquitous on the Web, electronic health records (EHRs) generally lack search functionality; furthermore, there is no knowledge on how and what healthcare providers search while using an EHR-based search utility. In this study, we sought to understand user needs as captured by their search queries.

Methods: This post-implementation study analyzed user search log files for 6 months from an EHR-based, free-text search utility at our large academic institution. The search logs were de-identified and then analyzed in two steps. First, two investigators classified all the unique queries as navigational, transactional, or informational searches. Second, three physician reviewers categorized a random sample of 357 informational searches into high-level semantic types derived from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). The reviewers were given overlapping data sets, such that two physicians reviewed each query.

Results: We analyzed 2207 queries performed by 436 unique users over a 6-month period. Of the 2207 queries, 980 were unique queries. Users of the search utility included clinicians, researchers and administrative staff. Across the whole user population, approximately 14.5% of the user searches were navigational searches and 85.1% were informational. Within informational searches, we found that users predominantly searched for laboratory results and specific diseases.

Conclusions: A variety of user types, ranging from clinicians to administrative staff, took advantage of the EHR-based search utility. Though these users' search behavior differed, they predominantly performed informational searches related to laboratory results and specific diseases. Additionally, a number of queries were part of words, implying the need for a free-text module to be included in any future concept-based search algorithm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Results for query “diabetes” on a test patient
Figure 2
Figure 2. The various user types of the search utility
Figure 3
Figure 3. Number of Unique Queries Per Month

References

    1. Hippisley-Cox J, et al. The electronic patient record in primary care--regression or progression? A cross sectional study. BMJ. 2003;326(7404):1439–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tange HJ. The paper-based patient record: is it really so bad? Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1995;48(1-2):127–31. - PubMed
    1. Christensen T, Grimsmo A. Instant availability of patient records, but diminished availability of patient information: a multi-method study of GP's use of electronic patient records. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2008;8:12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chisnell C, Dunn K, Sittig DF. Determining educational needs for the biomedical library customer: an analysis of end-user searching in MEDLINE. Medinfo MEDINFO. 1995;8 Pt 2:1423–7. - PubMed
    1. Hersh WR, et al. CliniWeb: managing clinical information on the World Wide Web. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996;3(4):273–80. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms