Comparison of surgical stress index-guided analgesia with standard clinical practice during routine general anesthesia: a pilot study

Abstract

Background: Surgical stress index (SSI), a novel multivariate index, has recently been proven to react well to surgical nociceptive stimuli and analgesic drug concentration changes during general anesthesia. We investigated the feasibility of application of SSI for guidance of remifentanil administration during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.

Methods: Eighty patients scheduled for elective ear-nose-throat surgery were randomized into two groups, SSI-guided analgesia group (SSI group) and standard practice analgesia group (control group). In both groups, anesthesia was maintained with a propofol target-controlled infusion and adjusted stepwise by 0.5 microg/ml to keep bispectral index values between 40 and 60. In the SSI group, the predicted effect-site concentration of remifentanil was adjusted stepwise by 1 ng/ml to keep SSI values between 20 and 50, whereas in the control group, predicted effect-site concentration of remifentanil was adjusted according to traditional inadequate analgesia criteria. Anesthetics consumption, recovery times, and incidence of unwanted events were recorded.

Results: Remifentanil consumption (average normalized infusion rate) was lower in the SSI group than in the control group (mean +/- SD, 9.5 +/- 3.8 microg . kg(-1) . h(-1) vs. 12.3 +/- 5.2 microg . kg(-1) . h(-1); P < 0.05). The number of unwanted events was less in the SSI group (84) than in the control group (556; P < 0.01). Recovery times were comparable between groups. No patient reported intraoperative recall.

Conclusions: SSI-guided anesthesia resulted in lower remifentanil consumption, more stable hemodynamics, and a lower incidence of unwanted events.