Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr 19;5(4):e10229.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010229.

Common garden experiment reveals genetic control of phenotypic divergence between swamp sparrow subspecies that lack divergence in neutral genotypes

Affiliations

Common garden experiment reveals genetic control of phenotypic divergence between swamp sparrow subspecies that lack divergence in neutral genotypes

Barbara Ballentine et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Adaptive divergence between populations in the face of strong selection on key traits can lead to morphological divergence between populations without concomitant divergence in neutral DNA. Thus, the practice of identifying genetically distinct populations based on divergence in neutral DNA may lead to a taxonomy that ignores evolutionarily important, rapidly evolving, locally-adapted populations. Providing evidence for a genetic basis of morphological divergence between rapidly evolving populations that lack divergence in selectively neutral DNA will not only inform conservation efforts but also provide insight into the mechanisms of the early processes of speciation. The coastal plain swamp sparrow, a recent colonist of tidal marsh habitat, differs from conspecific populations in a variety of phenotypic traits yet remains undifferentiated in neutral DNA.

Methods and principal findings: Here we use an experimental approach to demonstrate that phenotypic divergence between ecologically separated populations of swamp sparrows is the result of local adaptation despite the lack of divergence in neutral DNA. We find that morphological (bill size and plumage coloration) and life history (reproductive effort) differences observed between wild populations were maintained in laboratory raised individuals suggesting genetic divergence of fitness related traits.

Conclusions and significance: Our results support the hypothesis that phenotypic divergence in swamps sparrows is the result of genetic differentiation, and demonstrate that adaptive traits have evolved more rapidly than neutral DNA in these ecologically divergent populations that may be in the early stages of speciation. Thus, identifying evolutionarily important populations based on divergence in selectively neutral DNA could miss an important level of biodiversity and mislead conservation efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Progression of molt for experimental populations (n = 16 inland, n = 16 coastal).
Molt initiation for inland adults is estimated from linear regression of molt score on date for data collected from 8/25 to 9/22.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Regression of cloacal protuberance for 9 experimental males from each population.
All experimental males from both populations had maximum CP scores (3) during the normal breeding season between May and July.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Endler JA. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1986. Natural selection in the wild.
    1. Mayr E. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1963. Animal Species and Evolution.
    1. Mace GM, Purvis A. Evolutionary biology and practical conservation: bridging a widening gap. Molecular Ecology. 2008;17:9–19. - PubMed
    1. Moritz C. Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Systematic Biology. 2002;51:238–254. - PubMed
    1. Winker K, Rocque DA, Braile TM, Pruett CL. Vainly beating the air: species-concept debates need not impede progress in science or conservation. Ornithological Monographs. 2007;63:30–44.

Publication types