Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jul;54(7):2965-73.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.01198-09. Epub 2010 Apr 26.

Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir-ritonavir with and without nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in Ugandan HIV-infected adults

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir-ritonavir with and without nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in Ugandan HIV-infected adults

C Kityo et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir-ritonavir with and without nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) in Ugandan adults. The study design was a three-period crossover study (3 tablets [600 mg of lopinavir/150 mg of ritonavir {600/150 mg}], 4 capsules [533/133 mg], and 2 tablets [400/100 mg] twice a day [BD]; n = 40) of lopinavir-ritonavir with NNRTIs and a parallel one-period study (2 tablets BD; n = 20) without NNRTIs. Six-point pharmacokinetic sampling (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h) was undertaken after observed intake with a standardized breakfast. Ugandan DART trial participants receiving efavirenz (n = 20), nevirapine (n = 18), and no NNRTI (n = 20) had median ages of 41, 35, and 37 years, respectively, and median weights of 60, 64, and 63 kg, respectively. For the no-NNRTI group, the geometric mean (percent coefficient of variation [%CV]) lopinavir area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) was 110.1 (34%) microg x h/liter. For efavirenz, the geometric mean lopinavir AUC(0-12) (%CV) values were 91.8 microg x h/liter (58%), 65.7 microg x h/liter (39%), and 54.0 microg x h/liter (65%) with 3 tablets, 4 capsules, and 2 tablets BD, respectively, with corresponding (within-individual) geometric mean ratios (GMR) for 3 and 2 tablets versus 4 capsules of 1.40 (90% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 1.65; P = 0.002) and 0.82 (90% CI, 0.68 to 0.99; P = 0.09), respectively, and the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) values were reduced by 58% and 1%, respectively. For nevirapine, the geometric mean lopinavir AUC(0-12) (%CV) values were 112.9 microg x h/liter (30%), 68.1 microg x h/liter (53%), and 61.5 microg x h/liter (52%), respectively, with corresponding GMR values of 1.66 (90% CI, 1.46 to 1.88; P < 0.001) and 0.90 (90% CI, 0.77 to 1.06; P = 0.27), respectively, and the CL/F was reduced by 57% and 7%, respectively. Higher values for the lopinavir concentration at 12 h (C(12)) were observed with 3 tablets and efavirenz-nevirapine (P = 0.04 and P = 0.0005, respectively), and marginally lower C(12) values were observed with 2 tablets and efavirenz-nevirapine (P = 0.08 and P = 0.26, respectively). These data suggest that 2 tablets of lopinavir-ritonavir BD may be inadequate when dosed with NNRTIs in Ugandan adults, and the dosage should be increased by the addition of an additional adult tablet or a half-dose tablet (100/25 mg), where available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Mean plasma concentrations (95% CI) of lopinavir and ritonavir over time.

References

    1. Ananworanich, J., P. Kosalaraksa, A. Hill, U. Siangphoe, A. Bergshoeff, C. Pancharoen, C. Engchanil, K. Ruxrungtham, and D. Burger. 2005. Pharmacokinetics and 24-week efficacy/safety of dual boosted saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir in nucleoside-pretreated children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 24:874-879. - PubMed
    1. Chiu, Y., M. King, J. Li, C. Klein, and G. Hanna. 2007. Trough lopinavir concentrations do not predict virologic response to lopinavir/ritonavir-based three-drug regimens in antiretroviral-naïve patients, poster 38. Abstr. 8th Int. Wkshp. Clin. Pharmacol. HIV Ther., 16 to 18 April 2007, Budapest, Hungary.
    1. DART Trial Team. 2009. Routine versus clinically driven laboratory monitoring of HIV antiretroviral therapy in Africa (DART): a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 375:123-131. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dickinson, L., L. Robinson, J. Tjia, S. Khoo, and D. Back. 2005. Simultaneous determination of HIV protease inhibitors amprenavir, atazanavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 829:82-90. - PubMed
    1. Else, L., T. Mahungu, Z. Cuthbertson, C. Smith, D. Podlekareva, P. Hay, U. B. Dragsted, S. Khoo, M. Johnson, D. Back, and M. Youle. 2008. An open-label multi-centre pilot study evaluating the pharmacokinetics of co-administered lopinavir and nevirapine in HIV-infected adults. The NRTI-sparing study, abstr. P250. Abstr. 9th Int. Congr. Drug Ther. HIV Infect., Glasgow, United Kingdom, November 2008.

Publication types

MeSH terms