Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Oct;25(10):1003-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1351-8. Epub 2010 Apr 27.

Medical decision-making during the guardianship process for incapacitated, hospitalized adults: a descriptive cohort study

Robin J Bandy  1 , Paul R Helft, Robert W Bandy, Alexia M Torke
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Medical decision-making during the guardianship process for incapacitated, hospitalized adults: a descriptive cohort study

Robin J Bandy et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Background: It is sometimes necessary for courts to appoint guardians for adult, incapacitated patients. There are few data describing how medical decisions are made for such patients before and during the guardianship process.

Objective: To describe the process of medical decision-making for incapacitated, hospitalized adults for whom court-appointed guardians are requested.

Design: Retrospective, descriptive cohort study.

Measurements: Patients were identified from the legal files of a public, urban hospital. Medical and legal records were reviewed for demographic data, code status, diagnoses, code status orders and invasive procedures and person authorizing the order or procedure, dates of incapacitation and appointment of temporary guardian, reason for guardianship, and documentation of communication with a guardian.

Results: A total of 79 patients met inclusion criteria; 68.4% were male and 56.2% African-American. The median age was 65 years. Of the 71 patients with medical records available 89% of patients had a temporary guardianship petitioned because of the need for placement only. Seventeen patients had a new DNR order written during hospitalization, eight of which were ordered by physicians without consultation with a surrogate decision maker. Overall, 32 patients underwent a total of 81 documented invasive procedures, 16 of which were authorized by the patient, 15 by family or friend, and 11 by a guardian; consent was not required for 39 of the procedures because of emergency conditions or because a procedure was medically necessary and no surrogate decision maker was available.

Conclusions: Although most of the guardianships were requested for placement purposes, important medical decisions were made while patients were awaiting appointment of a guardian. Hospitalized, incapacitated adults awaiting guardianship may lack a surrogate decision maker when serious decisions must be made about their medical care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gillick MR. Medical decision-making for the unbefriended nursing home resident. J Ethics Law Aging. 1995;1(2):87–92. - PubMed
    1. Karp N, Wood E. Incapacitated and Alone: Healthcare Decision-making for Unbefriended Older People. American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging; 2003.
    1. Veatch RM. Limits of guardian treatment refusal: a reasonableness standard. Am J Law Med. 1984;9(4):427–68. - PubMed
    1. Chambers-Evans J, Carnevale F. Dawning of awareness: the experience of surrogate decision making at the end of life. J Clin Ethics. 2005;16(1):28–45. - PubMed
    1. Jeffers BR. The surrogate’s experience during treatment decision-making. Med Surg Nurs. 1998;7(6):357–63. - PubMed

Publication types