Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jan;12(1):68-75.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-009-0075-z.

CT coronary angiography: 256-slice and 320-detector row scanners

Affiliations
Review

CT coronary angiography: 256-slice and 320-detector row scanners

Edward M Hsiao et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has rapidly evolved from 4-detector row systems in 1998 to 256-slice and 320-detector row CT systems. With smaller detector element size and faster gantry rotation speed, spatial and temporal resolution of the 64-detector MDCT scanners have made coronary artery imaging a reliable clinical test. Wide-area coverage MDCT, such as the 256-slice and 320-detector row MDCT scanners, has enabled volumetric imaging of the entire heart free of stair-step artifacts at a single time point within one cardiac cycle. It is hoped that these improvements will be realized with greater diagnostic accuracy of CT coronary angiography. Such scanners hold promise in performing a rapid high quality "triple rule-out" test without high contrast load, improved myocardial perfusion imaging, and even four-dimensional CT subtraction angiography. These emerging technical advances and novel applications will continue to change the way we study coronary artery disease beyond detecting luminal stenosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Whole intracoronary endothelial shear stress (ESS) mapping from single-heartbeat 320-detector row CT (Toshiba Aquilion One Dynamic Volume CT; Tochigi, Japan) after injection of 80 mL of iopamidol, 370 mg I/mL (Isovue-370; Bracco Diagnostics, Princeton, NJ), followed by 40 mL of normal saline injected with a dual injector (EZEM Empower CTA DUAL Injector; EZEM Inc., Lake Success, NY). Three-dimensional volume-rendered images generated from Vitrea 4.1 software (Vital Images, Minnetonka, MN) (left side). Corresponding ESS maps (right side). Simulated blood flow uses a computational fluid dynamic technique. (Adapted from Ramkumar et al. [59]; with permission)

References

    1. Lawler LP, Pannu HK, Fishman EK. MDCT evaluation of the coronary arteries, 2004: how we do it—data acquisition, postprocessing, display, and interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:1402–1412. - PubMed
    1. Budoff M, Dowe D, Jollis J, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724–1732. This is a major trial in the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT CT coronary angiography. - PubMed
    1. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2324–2336. This is another major trial in the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT CT coronary angiography. - PubMed
    1. American College of Radiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; North American Society for Cardiac Imaging; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3:751–771. - PubMed
    1. Voros S. What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of volumetric CT scanning? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:67–70. - PubMed

MeSH terms