Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;152A(5):1250-6.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33377.

Consent for genetic research in the Framingham Heart Study

Affiliations

Consent for genetic research in the Framingham Heart Study

Daniel Levy et al. Am J Med Genet A. 2010 May.

Abstract

Extensive efforts have been aimed at understanding the genetic underpinnings of complex diseases that affect humans. Numerous genome-wide association studies have assessed the association of genes with human disease, including the Framingham Heart Study (FHS), which genotyped 550,000 SNPs in 9,000 participants. The success of such efforts requires high rates of consent by participants, which is dependent on ethical oversight, communications, and trust between research participants and investigators. To study this we calculated percentages of participants who consented to collection of DNA and to various uses of their genetic information in two FHS cohorts between 2002 and 2009. The data included rates of consent for providing a DNA sample, creating an immortalized cell line, conducting research on various genetic conditions including those that might be considered sensitive, and for notifying participants of clinically significant genetic findings were above 95%. Only with regard to granting permission to share DNA or genetic findings with for-profit companies was the consent rate below 95%. We concluded that the FHS has maintained high rates of retention and consent for genetic research that has provided the scientific freedom to establish collaborations and address a broad range of research questions. We speculate that our high rates of consent have been achieved by establishing frequent and open communications with participants that highlight extensive oversight procedures. Our approach to maintaining high consent rates via ethical oversight of genetic research and communication with study participants is summarized in this report and should be of help to other studies engaged in similar types of research. Published 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Annas GJ. Rules for research on human genetic variation: lessons from Iceland. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1830–1833. - PubMed
    1. Beskow LM, Dean E. Informed Consent for Biorepositories: Assessing Prospective Participants’ Understanding and Opinions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers. 2008;17:1440–1451. - PubMed
    1. Bookman EB, Langehorne AA, Eckfeldt JH, Glass KC, Jarvik GP, Klag M, Koski G, Motulsky A, Wilfond B, Manolio TA, Fabsitz RR, Luepker1 RV. Reporting Genetic Results in Research Studies: Summary and Recommendations of an NHLBI Working Group. Am J Med Genet A. 2006 May 15;140:1033–1040. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caulfield T, McGuire AL, Cho M, Buchanan JA, Burgess MM, Danilczyk U, Diaz CM, Fryer-Edwards K, Green SK, Hodosh MA, Juengst ET, Kaye J, Kedes L, Knoppers BM, Lemmens T, Meslin EM, Murphy J, Nussbaum RL, Otlowski M, Pullman D, Ray PN, Sugarman J, Timmons M. Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus Statement. PLoS Biology. 2008;6(3):e73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dawber TR, Meadors GF, Moore FEJ. Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health. 1951;41:279–286. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types