Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;47(3):284-92.
doi: 10.1597/08-172.1.

Language and early reading among children with orofacial clefts

Language and early reading among children with orofacial clefts

Brent R Collett et al. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010 May.

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that children with orofacial clefts score lower than controls on measures of language and reading and to examine predictors of these outcomes.

Design: Longitudinal study tracking the development of children with and without orofacial clefts from infancy through age 7 years.

Subjects: Children with isolated cleft lip and palate (n = 29) and cleft palate only (n = 28) were recruited from the craniofacial program in an urban medical center. Seventy-seven demographically similar, unaffected controls were recruited via advertisements placed in area pediatric clinics and community centers.

Measures: Infant measures assessed child development and mother-child interactions during feeding and teaching tasks. At ages 5 and 7 years, measures of language functioning and academic achievement were completed along with an interview to collect school placement data and information on speech services received.

Results: There were no significant group differences in language at ages 5 and 7 years. Children with clefts scored significantly higher than controls on measures of early reading at age 7 years. Outcomes were predicted by demographic factors, the quality of mother-child interactions during teaching and feeding tasks, and cognitive development scores at age 24 months.

Conclusions: Findings do not support the hypothesis that children with clefts score lower than controls on neurocognitive and academic achievement measures. Predictive analyses revealed several dimensions that may be used in clinical practice to identify children at risk for learning and developmental concerns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen R, Wasserman GA, Seidman S. Children with congenital anomalies: the preschool period. J Pediatr Psychol. 1990;15:327–345. - PubMed
    1. American Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Association (ACPA) Parameters for evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial anomalies. [Accessed July 14, 2008]; Available at http://www.acpa-cpf.org/teamcare/Parameters07rev.pdf. - PubMed
    1. Barnard KE, Hammond MA, Booth CL, Bee HL, Mitchell SK, Spieker SJ. Measurement and meaning of parent-child interaction. In: Morrison F, Lord C, Keating D, editors. Applied Developmental Psychology. Vol. 3. San Diego: Academic Press; 1989. pp. 39–79.
    1. Bayley Scales of Infant Development. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp; 1969.
    1. Broder HL, Richman LC, Matheson PB. Learning disability, school achievement, and grade retention among children with cleft: a two-center study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35:127–131. - PubMed

MeSH terms