Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jun;13(6):776-91.
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01464.x. Epub 2010 Apr 21.

Integration of molecular functions at the ecosystemic level: breakthroughs and future goals of environmental genomics and post-genomics

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Integration of molecular functions at the ecosystemic level: breakthroughs and future goals of environmental genomics and post-genomics

Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse et al. Ecol Lett. 2010 Jun.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Environmental genomics and genome-wide expression approaches deal with large-scale sequence-based information obtained from environmental samples, at organismal, population or community levels. To date, environmental genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics are arguably the most powerful approaches to discover completely novel ecological functions and to link organismal capabilities, organism-environment interactions, functional diversity, ecosystem processes, evolution and Earth history. Thus, environmental genomics is not merely a toolbox of new technologies but also a source of novel ecological concepts and hypotheses. By removing previous dichotomies between ecophysiology, population ecology, community ecology and ecosystem functioning, environmental genomics enables the integration of sequence-based information into higher ecological and evolutionary levels. However, environmental genomics, along with transcriptomics and proteomics, must involve pluridisciplinary research, such as new developments in bioinformatics, in order to integrate high-throughput molecular biology techniques into ecology. In this review, the validity of environmental genomics and post-genomics for studying ecosystem functioning is discussed in terms of major advances and expectations, as well as in terms of potential hurdles and limitations. Novel avenues for improving the use of these approaches to test theory-driven ecological hypotheses are also explored.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Real-life and ideal fluxes of analysis and information in environmental genomics. Current throughputs of analysis and information-processing are given as black arrows, whereas the ideal throughputs to be achieved are shown as white arrows. Arrow thickness reflects the efficiency of the analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mathematical modelling in environmental genomics analysis. Reconstructed networks from environmental genomics data (Box S2) can be analysed by various methods of mathematical modelling (Getz 2003; Feist et al. 2008; Westerhoff & Palsson 2008; Fuhrman 2009), that can assess and quantify their dynamic properties and generate hypotheses on community and ecosystem functioning. Hypothesis testing can then be carried out by experimental and environmental verification approaches, with the subsequent possibility of iterations between the different steps of the process. The main steps in this flowchart are derived from the description of the systems biology paradigm by Palsson (2006).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Spatio-temporal three-dimensional organisation of sequence-derived datasets. The set of environmental genomic, cDNA, or protein sequences (grey bars) is ascribed to a set of i Species (S), thus resulting in species-labelled sequences (colour bars). The aim of functional analysis and profiling is to ascribe species-labelled sequences to a set of j functional categories (F), thus resulting in a ‘potential function × species’ understanding of the ecosystem. The third dimension of the matrix corresponds to spatio-temporally replicated samples, such as samples subjected to various environmental constraints, or samples at different points in time. This kind of dataset can be analysed not only to understand the mechanisms induced by a forcing variable, but also to select and parameterize the components that have to be included in a model.

References

    1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 1995;59:143–169. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atamna-Ismaeel N, Sabehi G, Sharon I, Witzel KP, Labrenz M, Jürgens K, et al. Widespread distribution of proteorhodopsins in freshwater and brackish ecosystems. ISME J. 2008;2:656–662. - PubMed
    1. Ballatori N, Boyer JL, Rockett JC. Exploiting genome data to understand the function, regulation, and evolutionary origins of toxicologically relevant genes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003;111:871–875. - PubMed
    1. Béjà O, Aravind L, Koonin EV, Suzuki MT, Hadd A, Nguyen LP, et al. Bacterial rhodopsin: evidence for a new type of phototrophy in the sea. Science. 2000;289:1902–1906. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources