Safe conversion to cicloral, a generic cylosporine, in both stable and de novo renal transplant recipients
- PMID: 20427863
Safe conversion to cicloral, a generic cylosporine, in both stable and de novo renal transplant recipients
Abstract
Several generic cyclosporine (CsA) formulations have been developed over the last decade and are now widely available. In 2003 our local Health Department replaced Neoral with CicloHexal for the cost benefits, and we were compelled to convert all our renal transplant recipients to the generic CsA formulation. All renal transplant recipients were converted from Neoral to CicloHexal on a 1:1 dose basis in August/September 2003. Study 1 constitutes the retrospective review of all stable renal transplant patients and the CsA dose, CsA level and serum creatinine were noted. Study 2 constitutes the review of the records of de novo transplant patients inititated on CicloHexal compared to matched patients transplanted on Neoral before the conversion and the CsA dose, CsA level and serum creatinine noted (Study 2). There was no difference in the mean CsA dose, CsA level or serum creatinine at one month before conversion (on Neoral) compared to one month after conversion (on CicloHexal) in the 117 stable renal transplant recipients. Similarly, the mean CsA dose, CsA level and serum creatinine in de novo renal transplant recipients on Neoral (n=26) were similar to those on CicloHexal (n=23) at about seven and ten days postoperatively. In conclusion both stable and de novo renal transplant patients can be safely converted from Neoral to CicloHexal on a 1:1 dose basis.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of generic cyclosporine microemulsion versus neoral in de novo renal transplant recipients managed by 2-hour postdose monitoring.Transplant Proc. 2006 Sep;38(7):2051-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.07.004. Transplant Proc. 2006. PMID: 16979996 Clinical Trial.
-
The clinical impact of 1:1 conversion from Neoral to a generic cyclosporine (Gengraf) in renal transplant recipients with stable graft function.Clin Transplant. 2006 May-Jun;20(3):313-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00483.x. Clin Transplant. 2006. PMID: 16824147
-
How to convert from traditional cyclosporine to the microemulsion formulation in stable renal transplant patients?Clin Transplant. 1998 Oct;12(5):379-90. Clin Transplant. 1998. PMID: 9787945 Clinical Trial.
-
Potential clinical implications of substitution of generic cyclosporine formulations for cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) in transplant recipients.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Aug;60(6):389-95. doi: 10.1007/s00228-004-0774-8. Epub 2004 Jun 17. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004. PMID: 15205865 Review.
-
Generic cyclosporine: a word of caution.J Nephrol. 2004 Nov-Dec;17 Suppl 8:S20-4. J Nephrol. 2004. PMID: 15599881 Review.
Cited by
-
Progress in abdominal organ transplantation.Med Sci Monit. 2011 Dec;17(12):RA282-91. doi: 10.12659/msm.882119. Med Sci Monit. 2011. PMID: 22129915 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Generic immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ. 2015 Jun 22;350:h3163. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3163. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 26101226 Free PMC article.
-
Immunosuppression with Generics in Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Real-World Evidence Study.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Jan 12;18:53-69. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S431121. eCollection 2024. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024. PMID: 38229916 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical