Sentence processing in an artificial language: Learning and using combinatorial constraints
- PMID: 20430372
- PMCID: PMC2882523
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.001
Sentence processing in an artificial language: Learning and using combinatorial constraints
Abstract
A study combining artificial grammar and sentence comprehension methods investigated the learning and online use of probabilistic, nonadjacent combinatorial constraints. Participants learned a small artificial language describing cartoon monsters acting on objects. Self-paced reading of sentences in the artificial language revealed comprehenders' sensitivity to nonadjacent combinatorial constraints, without explicit awareness of the probabilities embedded in the language. These results show that even newly-learned constraints have an identifiable effect on online sentence processing. The rapidity of learning in this paradigm relative to others has implications for theories of implicit learning and its role in language acquisition.
2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Bicknell K, Elman JL, Hare M, McRae K, Kutas M. Online expectations for verbal arguments conditional on event knowledge. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society; Washington, DC. 2008.
-
- Cleeremans A, McClelland JL. Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1991;120:235–253. - PubMed
-
- Creel SC, Newport EL, Aslin RN. Distant melodies: Statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2004;30:1119–1130. - PubMed
-
- Ferreira F, Clifton C. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language. 1986;25:248–368.
-
- Gomez RL. Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science. 2002;13:431–436. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
