Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Oct;31(10):1703-9.
doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq087. Epub 2010 Apr 29.

Models of carcinogenesis: an overview

Affiliations
Review

Models of carcinogenesis: an overview

Paolo Vineis et al. Carcinogenesis. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

At least five coherent models of carcinogenesis have been proposed in the history of cancer research in the last century. Model 1 is mainly centered around mutations, and its main focus is on the chemical environment, radiation and viruses. Model 2 has to do mainly with genome instability and it focuses on familiality. Model 3 is based on non-genotoxic mechanisms, and clonal expansion and epigenetics are its main features. We propose a fourth model, which can encompass the previous three, based on the concept of a 'Darwinian' cell selection (we clarify that the term Darwinian needs to be used cautiously, being a short cut for 'somatic cellular selection'). Finally, a fifth model has recently become popular, based on the concept of 'tissue organization'. We describe examples of the five models and how they have been formalized mathematically. The five models largely overlap, both scientifically and historically, but for the sake of clarity, it is useful to treat them separately. We also argue that the five models can be included into a simpler scheme, i.e. two types of models: (i) biological changes in the epithelium alone lead to malignancy and (ii) changes in stroma/extracellular matrix are necessary (along with changes in epithelium) for malignancy. Our description, though simplified, looks realistic, it is able to capture the historical sequence of carcinogenesis theories in the last century and can serve as a frame to make research hypotheses more explicit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Cumulative risk of lung cancer according to different smoking habits from ref. (33).

References

    1. Hanahan D, et al. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. - PubMed
    1. Armitage P, et al. The age distribution of cancer and a multi-stage theory of carcinogenesis. Br. J. Cancer. 1954;8:1–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doll R, et al. Cigarette smoking and bronchial carcinoma: dose and time relationships among regular smokers and lifelong non-smokers. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 1978;32:303–313. - PMC - PubMed
    1. IARC. IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to man: some miscellaneous pharmaceutical substances. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risk Chem. Man. 1977;13:1–255. - PubMed
    1. McCann J, et al. Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: assay of 300 chemicals: discussion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1976;73:950–954. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types