Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May-Jun;28(3):162-71.
doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181d7812c.

The feasibility of integrating the Omaha system data across home care agencies and vendors

Bonnie L Westra  1 , Cristina Oancea, Kay Savik, Karen Dorman Marek
Affiliations

The feasibility of integrating the Omaha system data across home care agencies and vendors

Bonnie L Westra et al. Comput Inform Nurs. 2010 May-Jun.

Abstract

Federal and state initiatives are aligning around the goal that by 2014 all Americans will have electronic health records to support access to their health information any time and anywhere. As a key healthcare provider, nursing data must be included to enhance patient safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of care that is patient-centric. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of abstracting, integrating, and comparing the effective use of a standardized terminology, the Omaha System, across software vendors and 15 home care agencies. Results showed that the 2900 patients in this study had an average of four problems on care plans, with interventions most frequently addressing surveillance (39%) and teaching (30%). Findings in this study support the feasibility of integrating data across software vendors and agencies as well as the usefulness for describing care provided in home care. However, before exchanging data across systems, data quality issues found in this study need attention. There were missing data for 10.8% of patients as well as concerns about the validity of using the problem rating scale for outcomes. Strategies for effective use of standardized nursing terminologies are recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Framework for “Adopting Interoperable Electronic Health Records†.” †Minnesota Department Of Health (2008). http://www.health.state.mn us/e-health/ehrplan.html.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patients/ episodes by length of stay, living arrangements, and age.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of the percent interventions by category and agency.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percent of CHF patients with interventions by problem.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Change in outcomes for top five problems.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services [Accessed October 26, 2008];Health Information technology
    1. Institute of Medicine . Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2001. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine . To Err is Human: Building A Safer Health System. National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 1999. - PubMed
    1. Westra BL, Delaney CW, Konicek D, Keenan G. Nursing standards to support the electronic health record. Nursing Outlook. 2008;56:258–266. - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services [Accessed October 26, 2008];AHIC Use Cases and Extensions/Gaps. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/usecases/

Publication types

MeSH terms