Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;11(5):443-453.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.009.

Situational versus dispositional measurement of catastrophizing: associations with pain responses in multiple samples

Affiliations

Situational versus dispositional measurement of catastrophizing: associations with pain responses in multiple samples

Claudia M Campbell et al. J Pain. 2010 May.

Abstract

Catastrophizing is widely recognized as an important risk factor for adverse pain-related outcomes. However, questions remain surrounding the details of its assessment. In particular, recent laboratory studies suggest that evaluation of "situational" catastrophizing (ie, catastrophizing measured during or directly after the administration of noxious stimulation) may provide information distinct from that obtained by standard, or "dispositional" measures, which assess individuals' recall of catastrophizing in daily life. However, comparatively little research has systematically investigated the interrelationships and properties of these 2 different forms of pain-related catastrophizing. The current study evaluated both situational and dispositional catastrophizing measures within multiple samples: healthy individuals (N = 84), patients with painful temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD; N = 48), and patients with painful arthritis (N = 43). All participants first completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and then underwent psychophysical pain testing, which included heat, cold, and pressure pain. Participants then completed a situational catastrophizing measure with reference to the laboratory pain he/she had just undergone. Situational catastrophizing scores were not significantly correlated with dispositional PCS scores in the healthy participants and arthritis patients, though they were associated in TMD patients. Situational catastrophizing was more strongly associated with experimental pain responses than dispositional PCS scores for the healthy subjects and arthritis patients. In general, higher levels of situational catastrophizing were associated with lower pain thresholds and higher pain ratings across all 3 samples. The findings highlight the importance of multidimensional assessment of pain-related catastrophizing, and suggests a role for measuring catastrophizing related to specific, definable events.

Perspective: This study adds to a growing literature examining catastrophizing. Our findings highlight the potential importance of the multidimensional assessment of pain-related catastrophizing, and suggest a role for measuring catastrophizing related to specific, definable events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review. 1988;8:77–100.
    1. Beck AT, Ward C, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2009;4:561–571. - PubMed
    1. Bruehl S, Carlson CR, Wilson JF, Norton JA, Colclough G, Brady MJ, Sherman JJ, McCubbin JA. Psychological coping with acute pain: an examination of the role of endogenous opioid mechanisms. J Behav Med. 1996;19:129–142. - PubMed
    1. Buenaver LF, Edwards RR, Smith MT, Gramling SE, Haythornthwaite JA. Catastrophizing and pain- coping in young adults: associations with depressive symptoms and headache pain. J Pain. 2008;9:311–319. - PubMed
    1. Campbell CM, Edwards RR. Mind-body interactions in pain: the neurophysiology of anxious and catastrophic pain-related thoughts. Transl Res. 2009;153:97–101. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms