Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2010 May 25;107(21):E86-7; author reply E88-9.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002725107. Epub 2010 May 3.

Evidence for a recent increase in forest growth is questionable

Comment

Evidence for a recent increase in forest growth is questionable

Jane R Foster et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
(A) Derivative of McMahon et al.’s (1) AGB model (black) with 95% CIs (black dashes) (table 2 in ref. 1). We calculated above-ground net primary productivity (growth; blue) as a function of AGB using equations derived from Forest Inventory and Analysis plot data for the Mid-Atlantic states region (figure 9 in ref. 4). We estimated biomass lost to mortality assuming a constant annual mortality rate of 2.1% (3) of ensemble AGB (red dotted line). The sum of growth and mortality gives us an estimate of biomass change (green dashes), which corresponds with the authors’ model and confirms the definition of formula image (1). We note that temporal variability in either mortality or growth rates could cause point estimates of formula image from census plots to deviate from the model CIs. (B) To illustrate this, we allow the mortality rate to vary randomly over time, assuming that it is ~(0.021,0.005) We find that varying mortality rates (red) cause the observed formula image (green) to frequently fall outside of the model expectations (black lines). If mortality rates decline to 1% for remeasurement intervals similar to those cited by McMahon et al. (1), the resulting formula images exceed the upper confidence bound by approximately the amount observed by the authors (3–4 Mg·ha−1·yr−1).

Comment on

  • Evidence for a recent increase in forest growth.
    McMahon SM, Parker GG, Miller DR. McMahon SM, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3611-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912376107. Epub 2010 Feb 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010. PMID: 20133710 Free PMC article.

References

    1. McMahon SM, Parker GG, Miller DR. Evidence for a recent increase in forest growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:3611–3615. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark JS, Mohan J, Dietze M, Ibanez I. Coexistence: How to identify trophic trade-offs. Ecology. 2003;84:17–31.
    1. Caspersen JP, et al. Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S. forests. Science. 2000;290:1148–1151. - PubMed
    1. Jenkins JC, Birdsey RA, Pan Y. Biomass and NPP estimation for the Mid-Atlantic region (USA) using plot-level forest inventory data. Ecol Appl. 2001;11:1174–1193.
    1. Bormann FH, Likens GE. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem. New York: Springer; 1979. pp. 164–191.

LinkOut - more resources