Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2010 Apr;18(2):158-70.
doi: 10.1123/japa.18.2.158.

Estimating absolute and relative physical activity intensity across age via accelerometry in adults

Nora E Miller  1 , Scott J Strath, Ann M Swartz, Susan E Cashin
Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Estimating absolute and relative physical activity intensity across age via accelerometry in adults

Nora E Miller et al. J Aging Phys Act. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

This study examined the predictive validity of accelerometers (ACC) to estimate physical activity intensity (PAI) across age and differences in intensity predictions when expressed in relative and absolute PAI terms. Ninety adults categorized into 3 age groups (20-29, 40-49, and 60-69 yr) completed a treadmill calibration study with simultaneous ACC (7164 Actigraph) and oxygen-consumption assessment. Results revealed strong linear relations between ACC output and measured PAI (R2 = .62-.89) across age and similar ACC cut-point ranges across age delineating absolute PAI ranges compared with previous findings. Comparing measured metabolic equivalents (METs) with estimated METs derived from previously published regression equations revealed that age did not affect predictive validity of ACC estimates of absolute PAI. Comparing ACC output expressed in relative vs. absolute terms across age revealed substantial differences in PAI ACC count ranges. Further work is warranted to increase the applicability ofACC use relative to PAI differences associated with physiological changes with age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plot summarizing medians, 25th and 75th percentiles, and range of accelerometer counts per minute across speed by age group. *Statistically different from 60- to 69-year group, p < .05. Note. The 60- to 69-year group was omitted from 11.3 km/hr because only 1 participant finished that speed.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ainsworth BE, Bassett DR, Jr, Strath SJ, Swartz AM, O’Brien WL, Thompson RW, et al. Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S457–S464. - PubMed
    1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, Jacobs DR, Jr, Montoye HJ, Sallis JF, et al. Compendium of physical activities: Classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1993;25(1):71–80. - PubMed
    1. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 7. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
    1. Bassett DR, Jr, Howley ET, Thompson DL, King GA, Strath SJ, McLaughlin JE, et al. Validity of inspiratory and expiratory methods of measuring gas exchange with a computerized system. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2001;91(1):218–224. - PubMed
    1. Bassett DR., Jr Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2000;71(2, Suppl):S30–S36. - PubMed

Publication types