Rescoring ligand docking poses
- PMID: 20443166
Rescoring ligand docking poses
Abstract
The ranking of ligand docking poses according to certain scoring systems to identify the best fit is the most important step in virtual database screening for drug discovery. By focusing on method development strategy, this review provides possibilities for constructing rescoring approaches based on an overview of recent developments in the field. These developments can be classified into three categories. The first category involves a scaling approach that employs a factor to scale the primary scoring function. These scaling factors are defined with respect to the geometrical match between the location of a ligand and the target binding site, or defined according to a molecular weight distribution consistent with the empirical range of molecular weights of drug-like compounds. The second category involves consensus scoring approaches that use multiple scoring functions to rank the ligand poses retained in a docking procedure, based on the preliminary ranking according to a primary scoring function. The final category involves the addition of selected accuracy-oriented energy terms, such as the solvent effect and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics treatments.
Similar articles
-
Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Dec;48(12):2371-85. doi: 10.1021/ci800166p. J Chem Inf Model. 2008. PMID: 19007114
-
The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2008 May;11(3):356-64. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2008. PMID: 18428089 Review.
-
Scoring ligand similarity in structure-based virtual screening.J Mol Recognit. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):280-92. doi: 10.1002/jmr.942. J Mol Recognit. 2009. PMID: 19235177
-
Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.J Chem Inf Model. 2008 May;48(5):1081-91. doi: 10.1021/ci700470c. Epub 2008 May 9. J Chem Inf Model. 2008. PMID: 18465849
-
Ranking poses in structure-based lead discovery and optimization: current trends in scoring function development.Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2007 May;10(3):308-15. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2007. PMID: 17554857 Review.
Cited by
-
Optimization of Cavity-Based Negative Images to Boost Docking Enrichment in Virtual Screening.J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Feb 28;62(4):1100-1112. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01145. Epub 2022 Feb 8. J Chem Inf Model. 2022. PMID: 35133138 Free PMC article.
-
Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012 Feb;26(2):185-97. doi: 10.1007/s10822-011-9539-5. Epub 2012 Jan 10. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012. PMID: 22231069
-
Inhibitors of Helicobacter pylori protease HtrA found by 'virtual ligand' screening combat bacterial invasion of epithelia.PLoS One. 2011 Mar 31;6(3):e17986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017986. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21483848 Free PMC article.
-
Chalcone Derivatives: Promising Starting Points for Drug Design.Molecules. 2017 Jul 25;22(8):1210. doi: 10.3390/molecules22081210. Molecules. 2017. PMID: 28757583 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comprehensive Survey of Prospective Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Early Drug Discovery in the Past Fifteen Years.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 15;23(24):15961. doi: 10.3390/ijms232415961. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36555602 Free PMC article. Review.