Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Oct;2(5):374-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2009.00152.x.

Meta-analysis: A brief introduction

Affiliations
Review

Meta-analysis: A brief introduction

Jocelyn A Andrel et al. Clin Transl Sci. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Meta-analysis is the process of combining data from multiple sources and analyzing it together to increase power and provide a clearer picture of the effect of intervention or exposure on an outcome. The process is not complicated, but requires a great deal of attention to detail. A specific set of inclusion criteria for studies must be defined. Published or available study results may be affected by publication bias of several different types, so the researcher should be sure to conduct a thorough search of available databases in order to include unpublished findings. Following selection, the group of studies should be examined using funnel plots or statistical tests. Meta-analysis models themselves must be selected to properly reflect the combined studies. Both fixed- and random-effects modeling are discussed. Two case studies are presented, illustrating a well-conducted meta-analysis and a meta-analysis that was more controversial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) A funnel plot with pooled estimate (solid line) and approximate point‐wise 95% confidence limits showing no apparent publication bias. (B) A funnel plot suggesting publication bias in favor of larger studies and positive results.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A forest plot from a weighted meta‐analysis of odds ratios.

References

    1. Altman LK. New method of analyzing health data stirs debate. NewYork Times. 1990.
    1. Saul S. Heart attack risk seen in drug for diabetes. NewYork Times. 2007.
    1. Berman NG, Parker RA. Meta‐analysis: neither quick nor easy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002; 2: 10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benson JR, Saeb‐Parsy K. Meta‐analyses in cancer clinical trials: principles and pitfalls. World J Surg. 2006; 30: 1177–1183. - PubMed
    1. Jones DR. Meta‐analysis of observational epidemiological studies: a review. J R Soc Med. 1992; 85: 165–168. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources