Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;2(5):382-5.
doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2009.00147.x.

Creating an ontology-based human phenotyping system: The Rockefeller University bleeding history experience

Affiliations

Creating an ontology-based human phenotyping system: The Rockefeller University bleeding history experience

Andreas C Mauer et al. Clin Transl Sci. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

The lack of standardized methods for human phenotyping is a major obstacle in translational science. We have developed a bleeding history phenotyping system comprising an ontology, a questionnaire, a Web-based phenotype recording instrument (PRI), and a database. The ontology facilitates transparency, collaboration, aggregation of data, and data analysis. The integrated system allows investigators worldwide to use the PRI, add their de-identified data to the database, and query the aggregated data. Thus, this system can increase the power to detect genotype-phenotype-environment relationships and help new investigators begin their studies. We anticipate that this approach may be applicable to other disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Creation of the bleeding history phenotyping system. After an extensive literature search and review by experts, a paper‐based bleeding history clinical reminder form was expanded into a comprehensive bleeding history questionnaire (BHQ). The questionnaire was used to derive a bleeding history ontology (BHO) as well as a bleeding history database and a graphical user interface and electronic recording instrument, the phenotype recording instrument (PRI).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conceptual schematic of the bleeding history application ontology and bleeding history domain ontology. The examples of epistaxis and two associated questions are depicted. By deriving its structure directly from the bleeding history questionnaire, the bleeding history application ontology captures exact question syntax. In contrast, the bleeding history domain ontology is an idealized conceptualization of bleeding events, divorced from the exact syntax of any particular question. The bleeding history application ontology is linked to the bleeding history domain ontology via shared Properties. These Properties, in combination with Classes from either ontology, defi ne Individuals, which is a technical term that should not be confused with a specifi c person.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Phenotype recording instrument.

References

    1. Shindler E. Framingham heart study. Available at: http://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/about/milestones.html. Accessed September 14, 2009.
    1. Altshuler D, Daly MJ, Lander ES. Genetic mapping in human disease. Science. 2008; 322(5903): 881–888. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freimer N, Sabatti C. The human phenome project. Nat Genet. 2003; 34(1): 15–21. - PubMed
    1. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel‐Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000; 25(1): 25–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coller BS, Schneiderman PI. Clinical evaluation of hemorrhagic disorders: The bleeding history and differential diagnosis of purpura In: Hoffman R, Benz EJ, Shattil SJ, Furie B, Silberstein LE, McGlave P, eds. Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice. New York : Churchill Livingstone, 2009, 1851–1876.

Publication types