Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;41(4):238-43.
doi: 10.1363/4123809.

Prospective assessment of pregnancy intentions using a single- versus a multi-item measure

Megan L Kavanaugh  1 , Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Affiliations

Prospective assessment of pregnancy intentions using a single- versus a multi-item measure

Megan L Kavanaugh et al. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Context: Traditional measures of pregnancy intentions that are dichotomous and retrospective do not fully capture the complexity surrounding women's plans to become pregnant.

Methods: During January-June 2008, 249 women aged 15-44 awaiting pregnancy test results at family planning clinics in Pittsburgh completed a survey containing both single- and multi-item measures of pregnancy intentions. Chi-square analyses were used to assess differences between subgroups of women.

Results: Few women were trying to become or planning for pregnancy (11% on the single-item measure; 20% on the multi-item measure), while approximately one-third of the sample were not trying to become or planning for pregnancy (31% on the single-item and 36% on the multi-item measure). The single-item measure categorized more women as ambivalent about pregnancy (58%) than did the multi-item measure (44%). Of women categorized as ambivalent by the single-item measure, 62% were also categorized as ambivalent by the multi-item measure. Overall, 68% of responses to the two measures were concordant. With both measures, women who were not planning or trying for pregnancy were more likely than those who were planning for pregnancy or who were ambivalent to indicate that they planned to have an abortion if their test was positive (27-29% vs. 0-2%).

Conclusions: Prospective assessment of pregnancy intention with either a single- or a multi-item measure may allow for a more nuanced assessment of pregnancy intention than current measures. The multi-item measure may reduce the number of women categorized as ambivalent and aid the development of targeted contraceptive and preconception counseling interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Valid and precise measurement.
    Barrett G, Morof D, Rocca CH. Barrett G, et al. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010 Sep;42(3):220-1; author reply 221. doi: 10.1363/4222010. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010. PMID: 20887297 No abstract available.

References

    1. Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives. 1998;30(1):24–29. 46. - PubMed
    1. Brown SS, Eisenberg L, editors. The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-Being of Children and Families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995. - PubMed
    1. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2006;38(2):90–96. - PubMed
    1. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Healthy People 2010. [accessed Feb. 4, 2007]. < http://www.healthypeople.gov>.
    1. Santelli J, et al. The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2003;35(2):94–101. - PubMed

Publication types