Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Sep;117(1):4-16.
doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq134. Epub 2010 May 6.

Blood cytokines as biomarkers of in vivo toxicity in preclinical safety assessment: considerations for their use

Affiliations
Review

Blood cytokines as biomarkers of in vivo toxicity in preclinical safety assessment: considerations for their use

Jacqueline M Tarrant. Toxicol Sci. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

In the drive to develop drugs with well-characterized and clinically monitorable safety profiles, there is incentive to expand the repertoire of safety biomarkers for toxicities without routine markers or premonitory detection. Biomarkers in blood are pursued because of specimen accessibility, opportunity for serial monitoring, quantitative measurement, and the availability of assay platforms. Cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors (here referred to collectively as cytokines) show robust modulation in proximal events of inflammation, immune response, and repair. These are key general processes in many toxicities; therefore, cytokines are commonly identified during biomarker discovery studies. In addition, multiplexed cytokine immunoassays are easily applied to biomarker discovery and routine toxicity studies to measure blood cytokines. However, cytokines pose several challenges as safety biomarkers because of a short serum half-life; low to undetectable baseline levels; lack of tissue-specific or toxicity-specific expression; complexities related to cytokine expression with multiorgan involvement; and species, strain, and interindividual differences. Additional challenges to their application are caused by analytical, methodological, and study design-related variables. A final consideration is the strength of the relationship between changes in cytokine levels and the development of phenotypic or functional manifestations of toxicity. These factors should inform the integrated judgment-based qualification of novel biomarkers in preclinical, and potentially clinical, risk assessment. The dearth of robust, predictive cytokine biomarkers for specific toxicities is an indication of the significant complexity of these challenges. This review will consider the current state of the science and recommendations for appropriate application of cytokines in preclinical safety assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Preclinical toxicity biomarker qualification.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson P. Post-transcriptional control of cytokine production. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9:353–359. - PubMed
    1. Baena A, Mootnick AR, Falvo JV, Tsytskova AV, Ligeiro F, Diop OM, Brieva C, Gagneux P, O’Brien SJ, Ryder OA, et al. Primate TNF promoters reveal markers of phylogeny and evolution of innate immunity. PLoS One. 2007;2:e621. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bezbradica JS, Medzhitov R. Integration of cytokine and heterologous receptor signaling pathways. Nat. Immunol. 2009;10:333–339. - PubMed
    1. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2001;69:89–95. - PubMed
    1. Boehlen F, Clemetson KJ. Platelet chemokines and their receptors: what is their relevance to platelet storage and transfusion practice? Transfus. Med. 2001;11:403–417. - PubMed