Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;149(1):65-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.03.017. Epub 2010 May 7.

Redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a valuable surgical challenge

Affiliations

Redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a valuable surgical challenge

Jeremie H Lefevre et al. Surgery. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Redo surgery (RS) in patients with failed anastomosis is a rare procedure, and data about this surgery are lacking. The aim of this study was to examine the operative results and long-term outcomes of RS.

Methods: All patients who underwent RS between 1999 and 2008 were included. Data were analyzed from a prospective colorectal database. Failure of the procedure was defined as the inability to perform the RS or the inability to close the defunctioning stoma.

Results: Thirty-three patients (22 men) underwent the first surgery at a mean age of 53.4 years. Twenty-four had a colorectal anastomosis (CRA) and nine a coloanal anastomosis (CAA). The reasons for performing RS were stricture (n = 17), prior Hartmann procedure for complication on initial anastomosis (n = 6), chronic fistula (n = 5) or miscellaneous (n = 5). RS was impossible for 2 patients due to extensive adhesions. The mean operating time was 279 min (133-480) and the overall postoperative morbidity rate was 55%. The rate of anastomotic leakage and/or isolated pelvic abscess was 27%. After a mean delay of 3.9 months (0.3-16), 26 patients (79%) had a stoma closure. The mean number of stools per day was 3.2. The failure rates after new handsewn CAA and new stapled CRA were 33% (4/12) and 5% (1/19), respectively (P = .0385). The type of the former anastomosis influenced the success rate of restoring the intestinal continuity: failure rate after prior CAA was 56% and 8% after prior CRA (P = .0031).

Conclusion: Redo surgery for failure of previous CRA or CAA is feasible but requires a demanding surgical procedure with high short-term morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Easy-to-make sump suction or drain system.
    Mohammadhosseini B, Shirani S, Javadi MS. Mohammadhosseini B, et al. Surgery. 2011 Feb;149(2):299. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Sep 18. Surgery. 2011. PMID: 20850851 No abstract available.

MeSH terms