Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 5-year results from the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry
- PMID: 20451344
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.004
Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 5-year results from the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry
Abstract
Objectives: We performed the long-term follow-up of a large cohort of patients in a multicenter study receiving left main coronary artery (LMCA) revascularization.
Background: Limited information is available on long-term outcomes for patients with unprotected LMCA disease who underwent coronary stent procedure or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods: We evaluated 2,240 patients with unprotected LMCA disease who received coronary stents (n = 1,102; 318 with bare-metal stents and 784 with drug-eluting stents) or underwent CABG (n = 1,138) between 2000 and 2006 and for whom complete follow-up data were available for at least 3 to 9 years (median 5.2 years). The 5-year adverse outcomes (death; a composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], or stroke; and target vessel revascularization [TVR]) were compared with the use of the inverse probability of treatment weighted method and propensity-score matching.
Results: After adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors with the inverse probability of treatment weighting, the 5-year risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 1.44, p = 0.35) and the combined risk of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.37, p = 0.59) were not significantly different for patients undergoing stenting versus CABG. The risk of TVR was significantly higher in the stenting group than in the CABG group (HR: 5.11; 95% CI: 3.52 to 7.42, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in comparisons of bare-metal stent with concurrent CABG and of drug-eluting stent with concurrent CABG. In further analysis with propensity-score matching, overall findings were consistent.
Conclusions: During 5-year follow-up, stenting showed similar rates of mortality and of the composite of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke but higher rates of TVR as compared with CABG for patients with unprotected LMCA disease.
Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Long-term outcomes after stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 10-year results of bare-metal stents and 5-year results of drug-eluting stents from the ASAN-MAIN (ASAN Medical Center-Left MAIN Revascularization) Registry.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Oct 19;56(17):1366-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.097. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20946993
-
Stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease.N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 24;358(17):1781-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801441. Epub 2008 Mar 31. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18378517
-
Long-term clinical outcomes of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: analysis of the MAIN-COMPARE (revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison of percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus surgical revascularization) registry.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 25;54(9):853-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.071. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19695467 Clinical Trial.
-
Is stenting a preferred option for unprotected left main coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era?Indian Heart J. 2007 Mar-Apr;59(2 Suppl B):B105-12. Indian Heart J. 2007. PMID: 19153426 Review.
-
Stenting versus surgical bypass grafting for coronary artery disease: systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Ital Heart J. 2003 Apr;4(4):271-80. Ital Heart J. 2003. PMID: 12784781 Review.
Cited by
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease - A Single Hospital Experience without On-Site Cardiac Surgery.Acta Cardiol Sin. 2015 Jul;31(4):267-79. doi: 10.6515/acs20150119d. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2015. PMID: 27122882 Free PMC article.
-
Drug-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of four randomized trials and seventeen observational studies.Trials. 2013 May 8;14:133. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-133. Trials. 2013. PMID: 23782856 Free PMC article. Review.
-
PCI or CABG for Left Main Disease: Does Disease Location Matter?Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Feb;24(2):93-101. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01629-6. Epub 2022 Jan 17. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022. PMID: 35038131 Review.
-
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Disease - A Review.Interv Cardiol. 2013 Mar;8(1):14-18. doi: 10.15420/icr.2013.8.1.14. Interv Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 29588745 Free PMC article.
-
Combination of angiographic and clinical characteristics for the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing unprotected left main coronary artery stenting.Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Jun;101(6):477-85. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0417-5. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22286320
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical