Coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients suspected of coronary artery disease: impact of observer experience on diagnostic performance and interobserver reproducibility
- PMID: 20451487
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2010.03.010
Coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients suspected of coronary artery disease: impact of observer experience on diagnostic performance and interobserver reproducibility
Abstract
Background: A high diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in identifying coronary artery disease (CAD) has been shown in experienced high-volume centers. Whether this may be accomplished in centers with less CTA experience remains unknown.
Objectives: We determined the diagnostic performance and interobserver reproducibility of CTA in detecting significant CAD in a center with limited experience.
Methods: In 209 patients, CTA was performed with 64-slice or dual-source CT technology, and analyses were performed independently by 2 inexperienced observers. Significant CAD by CTA was defined as >/=1 stenoses >/=50% or >/=1 nonevaluable segment, whereas significant CAD by invasive quantitative coronary angiography was defined as >/=1 stenoses >/=50%. We evaluated the influence of CAD pretest probability, Agatston score (AS), heart rate (HR), and observer experience on the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), interobserver reproducibility, and duration of CTA analysis.
Results: Per-patient (CAD prevalence, 35%) sensitivity was 88%-99%, specificity was 78%-82%, PPV was 68%-74%, and NPV was 92%-99%. Overall interobserver reproducibility was good (kappa = 0.65). A significant temporal improvement was observed in diagnostic specificity (observer A: 68%-89%, P = 0.007; observer B: 71%-89%, P = 0.02), and interobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.35-0.89, P = 0.01) during the study period. Duration of analysis decreased during the study period and was positively associated with CAD pretest probability and AS.
Conclusions: Suboptimal diagnostic performance and interobserver reproducibility must be anticipated during CTA implementation. A high diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reproducibility were achieved after a large number of studies performed with the state-of-the-art scanner technology.
Copyright 2010 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Empirical cardiovascular CT training standards: did we get it right?J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010 May-Jun;4(3):195-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 May 19. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010. PMID: 20541707 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography as interpreted on a mobile handheld phone device.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 May;3(5):482-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.11.018. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010. PMID: 20466343 Clinical Trial.
-
The diagnostic accuracy of 256-row computed tomographic angiography compared with invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.Eur Heart J. 2010 Aug;31(15):1916-23. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq072. Epub 2010 Mar 16. Eur Heart J. 2010. PMID: 20233790
-
Assessment of Agatston coronary artery calcium score using contrast-enhanced CT coronary angiography.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Dec;195(6):1299-305. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3734. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010. PMID: 21098187
-
Diagnostic accuracy of CT coronary angiography.Cardiol Clin. 2009 Nov;27(4):563-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2009.06.011. Cardiol Clin. 2009. PMID: 19766913 Review.
-
Quantification of coronary arterial stenoses by multidetector CT angiography in comparison with conventional angiography methods, caveats, and implications.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Feb;4(2):191-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.10.011. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011. PMID: 21329905 Review.
Cited by
-
A manifesto for cardiovascular imaging: addressing the human factor.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1311-1321. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex216. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017. PMID: 29029029 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The diagnostic performance of coronary artery angiography with 64-MSCT and post 64-MSCT: systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2014 Jan 21;9(1):e84937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084937. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24465453 Free PMC article.
-
Observer variability in the assessment of CT coronary angiography and coronary artery calcium score: substudy of the Scottish COmputed Tomography of the HEART (SCOT-HEART) trial.Open Heart. 2015 May 19;2(1):e000234. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000234. eCollection 2015. Open Heart. 2015. PMID: 26019881 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and predictors of discrepancies in radiology resident interpretations of coronary CT in the emergency department.BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01781-3. BMC Med Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40597776 Free PMC article.
-
Computed tomography angiography versus Agatston score for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with stable chest pain: individual patient data meta-analysis of the international COME-CCT Consortium.Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug;32(8):5233-5245. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08619-4. Epub 2022 Mar 10. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35267094 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous