Factors affecting the long-term stability of orthodontic mini-implants
- PMID: 20451776
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.019
Factors affecting the long-term stability of orthodontic mini-implants
Abstract
Introduction: The placement and removal torques of mini-implants were evaluated as an index of implant stability. We examined factors affecting the initial and long-term stability of mini-implants.
Methods: We measured the placement and removal torques of 134 mini-implants placed in buccal posterior alveolar bone and assessed the relationships among placement and removal torques, placement period, age, sex, and cortical bone thickness. The mini-implants were machine-surfaced, 1.6 mm in diameter and 8 mm long. A torque screwdriver was used to measure the peak torque values.
Results and conclusions: The placement and removal torques averaged approximately 8 and 4 N cm, respectively. A torque of 4 N cm suggests sufficient anchorage capability for mini-implants. No significant correlation between placement and removal torques was found. Placement torque was significantly related to age and cortical bone thickness in the maxilla, whereas removal torque was not significantly related to placement period, age, sex, or cortical bone thickness.
Copyright (c) 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1595-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.015. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19615569
-
Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Feb;17(1):109-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01211.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006. PMID: 16441792
-
Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):779-84. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007. PMID: 17974113
-
Clinical indices for orthodontic mini-implants.J Oral Sci. 2011 Dec;53(4):407-12. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.53.407. J Oral Sci. 2011. PMID: 22167023 Review.
-
Predrilling of the implant site: Is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants?Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jun;137(6):825-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.038. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010. PMID: 20685539 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical and radiographic assessment of the association between orthodontic mini-screws and periodontal health.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):1376. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05136-2. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39543578 Free PMC article.
-
Chitosan from sea urchin (Diadema setosum) spines for orthodontic miniscrews: Antibacterial effects against key oral pathogens.J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 May-Jun;15(3):463-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.02.014. Epub 2025 Mar 11. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025. PMID: 40144647 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Evaluation of Primary Stability of Two Different Types of Orthodontic Mini-Implants.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S128-S131. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_604_20. Epub 2021 Jun 5. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021. PMID: 34447060 Free PMC article.
-
Stress distribution patterns at mini-implant site during retraction and intrusion--a three-dimensional finite element study.Prog Orthod. 2016;17:4. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0117-1. Epub 2016 Jan 18. Prog Orthod. 2016. PMID: 26780464 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between microporous and nanoporous orthodontic miniscrews : An experimental study in rabbits.J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Jan;85(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00398-3. Epub 2022 May 20. J Orofac Orthop. 2024. PMID: 35593908 English.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources