Early ambulation after percutaneous femoral access with use of closure devices and hemostatic agents
- PMID: 20451795
- DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.02.002
Early ambulation after percutaneous femoral access with use of closure devices and hemostatic agents
Abstract
Background: Patient satisfaction after percutaneous endovascular procedures is significantly influenced by the amount of time to ambulation postprocedure. The purpose of this study was to assess the complication rates of early ambulation after use of closure devices or topical hemostatic agents for femoral access sites for endovascular procedures.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent an endovascular procedure from a femoral access site between January 2004 and March 2008. The access site was closed with an Angio-Seal, StarClose, or D-Stat Dry with pressure. Patients ambulated 2 hr postprocedure when a closure device was used and 4 hr postprocedure when a D-Stat pad was applied. Access-site bleeding complications were assessed. Sheath size, closure method, patient characteristics, and antiplatelet status were analyzed.
Results: A total of 245 patients with a mean age of 70 years were identified. Of these, 154 (63%) patients were treated with a D-Stat pad with pressure, Angio-Seal was used on 83 (34%), and StarClose was used on eight (3%). The overall complication rate was 5.7%. Complications increased with increasing age (p = 0.003) and use of StarClose (p = 0.0001). The D-Stat pad was associated with a decreased complication rate (p = 0.03). Sheath size did not influence the incidence of bleeding. There was no significant increase in complications in patients taking an antiplatelet agent.
Conclusion: With a protocol using closure devices and hemostatic agents, early ambulation after percutaneous femoral access can be achieved safely with an acceptable complication rate in patients with peripheral vascular disease.
Copyright 2010 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The use of the StarClose device for obtaining femoral artery hemostasis.Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011 Oct;45(7):627-30. doi: 10.1177/1538574411410327. Epub 2011 Jun 5. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011. PMID: 21646232
-
Closure of the femoral artery after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of Angio-Seal, StarClose, and manual compression.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Mar 1;71(4):518-23. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21429. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. PMID: 18307223 Clinical Trial.
-
Femoral artery complications after cardiac catheterization: a study of patient profile.Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Apr;24(3):328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.06.025. Epub 2009 Sep 11. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 19748217
-
Suppose a Perclose.Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1999 Autumn;14(4):136-42. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1999. PMID: 10689725 Review.
-
Techniques for managing complications of arterial closure devices.Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2006 Oct-Nov;40(5):399-408. doi: 10.1177/1538574406293760. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2006. PMID: 17038574 Review.
Cited by
-
Use of ultrasound in the insertion of a vascular closure device: a comparative retrospective study with the standard blind technique.Radiol Med. 2015 Mar;120(3):283-8. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0439-3. Epub 2014 Aug 15. Radiol Med. 2015. PMID: 25120078
-
Comparative effectiveness and safety of Angio-Seal and StarClose vascular closure devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PeerJ. 2024 Dec 16;12:e18652. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18652. eCollection 2024. PeerJ. 2024. PMID: 39703921 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical