Sex as a patient selection criterion for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty
- PMID: 20452178
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.033
Sex as a patient selection criterion for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty
Abstract
Short-term to midterm results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty suggest various contraindications, in particular the female sex. This study evaluates survivorship and clinical outcomes of a large patient cohort to determine whether sex itself has a detrimental effect on the results of hip resurfacing. We compared the clinical and survivorship results of men and women from a series of 1107 resurfaced hips in 923 patients (681 males and 242 females). Women saw greater positive changes in walking, function, and the mental component of the Short Form-12. There was no difference in complication rates between men and women. Although the revision rate was higher in the women's group, the effect of sex disappeared when adjusted for component size and surgical technique. These data suggest that there is no appreciable effect of sex on implant survivorship and that women may be excellent candidates for resurfacing with proper surgical technique. This is a level III, retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes.Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67(2):116-9. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009. PMID: 19583537
-
Narrowed indications improve outcomes for hip resurfacing arthroplasty.Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011;69 Suppl 1:S27-9. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011. PMID: 22035481
-
A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes.Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67(2):108-12. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009. PMID: 19583535
-
Hip resurfacing-keys to success.Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67(2):142-5. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009. PMID: 19583543 Review.
-
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of the evidence for surgical technique, outcome, and complications.Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;41(2):263-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2010.01.002. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20399365 Review.
Cited by
-
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2012;12(19):1-63. Epub 2012 Aug 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2012. PMID: 23074429 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk factor analysis for early femoral failure in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the effect of bone density and body mass index.J Orthop Surg Res. 2012 Jan 10;7:1. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-7-1. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012. PMID: 22233783 Free PMC article.
-
ELIGIBILITY FOR THE HIP-RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY PROCEDURE: AN EVALUATION ON 592 HIPS.Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Dec 8;47(4):460-6. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30129-4. eCollection 2012 Jul-Aug. Rev Bras Ortop. 2015. PMID: 27047851 Free PMC article.
-
2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2131-4. Epub 2011 Oct 18. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 22006198 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis.PLoS One. 2016 Mar 1;11(3):e0147872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147872. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26930057 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical