Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Aug;104(8):1101-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 May 8.

Effect of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination on airway hyper-responsiveness in patients with well-controlled asthma

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination on airway hyper-responsiveness in patients with well-controlled asthma

P Chanez et al. Respir Med. 2010 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Background: The hypothesis that regular treatment aimed at achieving and maintaining asthma control is accompanied by reduced airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) was investigated.

Methods: Adult patients (PC(20) methacholine <8 mg/ml, FEV(1)% predicted >or=70%) received salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination 50/250 microg bd (SFC250) for a 12-week run-in; those achieving well-controlled (WC) asthma were randomised to SFC250 (n = 88) or SFC50/500 microg bd (SFC500) (n = 90) for 24 weeks. AHR (PC(20) methacholine), asthma control, lung function, symptoms, exacerbations and safety were assessed.

Results: During the 12 week run-in (SFC250), a greater than 1 doubling dose increase in PC(20) was observed. During randomised treatment, the increase in AHR was similar, and less than 1 doubling dose, for both groups (adjusted geometric mean PC(20) (mg/mL) at 24 weeks: SFC250: 2.796, SFC500: 2.802; p = 0.992). Compared with SFC250, patients receiving SFC500 had a more rapid improvement in AHR (adjusted mean ratio to baseline respectively at week 4: 1.193 vs. 1.386; week 12: 1.395 vs. 1.672; p = non-significant for both) and showed a greater response to treatment in patients with a low baseline PC(20). Patients maintaining WC asthma were 72 (84%) and 64 (74%) in the SFC250 and SFC500 groups respectively. Both doses of SFC were well tolerated; only four exacerbations were reported, all in the SFC500 group.

Conclusion: Regular treatment with SFC resulted in continuous improvement in AHR with maintenance of asthma control in the majority of patients. SFC500 showed a trend for a more rapid improvement in AHR and resulted in greater improvements in patients with a lower baseline PC(20).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms