Should aortas in patients with bicuspid aortic valve really be resected at an earlier stage than tricuspid? CON
- PMID: 20452545
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2010.02.003
Should aortas in patients with bicuspid aortic valve really be resected at an earlier stage than tricuspid? CON
Abstract
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-associated aortopathy is a complex phenomenon, and the current lack of univocal interpretation of its causes and treatment can be ascribed to the multiform nature of its clinical presentation. Although there is strong bias in the literature favoring more aggressive treatment of ascending aortic dilatation in patients with BAV, evidence supporting this opinion is lacking. This review discusses some of the relevant issues relating to causation to facilitate a better analysis of the current recommendations used to guide surgical management, and concludes that treatment should be tailored by individual valvular pathology, clinical phenotype, and relevant comorbidities, using well-documented evidence-based clinical size criteria.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Editorial comment: should aortas in patients with bicuspid aortic valve really be resected at an earlier stage than those in patients with tricuspid valve?Cardiol Clin. 2010 May;28(2):315-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2010.02.020. Cardiol Clin. 2010. PMID: 20452546 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Should aortas in patients with bicuspid aortic valve really be resected at an earlier stage than tricuspid? PRO.Cardiol Clin. 2010 May;28(2):289-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2010.01.005. Cardiol Clin. 2010. PMID: 20452544 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
