Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb 26;15(2):70-8.
doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-15-2-70.

Cognitive impairment in patients with a schizoaffective disorder: a comparison with bipolar patients in euthymia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Cognitive impairment in patients with a schizoaffective disorder: a comparison with bipolar patients in euthymia

G Studentkowski et al. Eur J Med Res. .

Abstract

Objectives: Several studies have shown persistent neurocognitive impairment in patients with a bipolar affective disorder (BD) even in euthymia as well as in patients with a schizoaffective disorder (SAD). The aim of our study was to compare the neuropsychological performance between these two groups. Confounding variables were controlled to enhance our understanding of cognitive dysfunction in both BD and SAD.

Methods: Several domains of neurocognitive function, executive function, memory, attention, concentration and perceptuomotor function were examined in 28 euthymic SAD patients and 32 BD patients by using a neuropsychological test battery. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) were used to evaluate the patients' clinical status. Data analysis was performed by using a multivariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA/MANCOVA).

Results: Euthymic SAD patients showed greater cognitive impairment than euthymic BD patients in the tested domains including declarative memory and attention. Putative significant group differences concerning cognitive flexibility vanished when controlled for demographic and clinical variables. Age and medication were robust predictors to cognitive performance of both SAD and BD patients.

Conclusions: Our results point out the worse cognitive outcome of SAD compared to BD patients in remission. Remarkably, the variance is higher for some of the test results between the groups than within each group, this being discussed in light of the contradictive concept of SAD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albus M, Hubmann W, Wahlheim, Sobizack N, Franz U, Mohr F. Contrasts in neuropsychological test profile between patients with first-episode schizophrenia and first-episode affective disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996;94:87–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb09830.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baethge C. Long-term treatment of schizoaffective disorder: review and recommendations. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2003;36(2):45–56. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39045. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beblo T. In: Neuropsychologie psychischer Störungen. Lautenbacher S, Gaugel S, editor. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; 2004. Neuropsychologie affektiver Störungen.
    1. Berrenttini WH. Are schizophrenic and bipolar disorders related? A review of family and molecular studies. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;48(6):531–538. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00883-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bornstein RA, Nasrallah HA, Olson SC, Coffman JA, Torello M, Schwarzkopf SB. Neuropsychological deficit in schizophrenic subtypes: paranoid, nonparanoid, and schizoaffective subgroups. Psychiatry Res. 1990;31:15–24. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(90)90104-D. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types