Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 May;2(5):a001032.
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001032. Epub 2009 Dec 9.

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the p53 signaling pathway

Affiliations
Review

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the p53 signaling pathway

Lukasz F Grochola et al. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010 May.

Abstract

The p53 tumor suppressor pathway is central both in reducing cancer frequency in vertebrates and in mediating the response of commonly used cancer therapies. This article aims to summarize and discuss a large body of evidence suggesting that the p53 pathway harbors functional inherited single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that affect p53 signaling in cells, resulting in differences in cancer risk and clinical outcome in humans. The insights gained through these studies into how the functional p53 pathway SNPs could help in the tailoring of cancer therapies to the individual are discussed. Moreover, recent work is discussed that suggests that many more functional p53 pathway SNPs are yet to be fully characterized and that a thorough analysis of the functional human genetics of this important tumor suppressor pathway is required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Incorporating information of both the inherited and somatic genetics of the p53 gene could further define patient populations in their abilities to respond to certain therapies. (A) Some studies suggest that cells from individuals with the proline (Pro) allele of p53 codon72 will undergo less apoptosis in response to DNA-damage-inducing therapies compared with individuals with the arginine (Arg) allele of p53 codon72. This has been suggested to be caused by less transcriptional activation of apoptotic effectors. (B) Other studies suggest that cancer cells with somatic p53 mutations from individuals with the proline (Pro) allele of p53 codon72 will undergo more apoptosis in response to DNA-damage-inducing therapies compared with individuals with the arginine (Arg) allele of p53 codon72. This has been suggested to be potentially because of an enhanced inhibition of the p73 tumor suppressor by mtp53-codon72-Arg.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Individuals with different genotypes of MDM2 SNP309 could be affected differently by estrogen signaling manipulation. A model has been proposed that the primarily female-specific hormone, estrogen, preferentially stimulated transcription of the MDM2 gene with the G-allele of SNP309, potentially through the direct interaction of the estrogen receptor (ESR) and the transcription factor SP1 on the MDM2 promoter. If true, this predicts that inhibition of estrogen signaling in individuals with the G-allele of MDM2 SNP309 would lead to a reduction of MDM2 levels and a reactivation of p53 activity, allowing for either better tumor suppression or tumor clearance compared with individuals with the T-allele.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Map of selected p53 pathway-associated genes that harbor known or potential functional SNPs (octagon-shaped boxes) and their closely interacting genes (rectangular boxes). The map depicts genes involved in the core regulation of p53 (light red boxes), the DNA-damage response (yellow), the extrinsic apoptotic response (green), the cell-cycle (turquoise) and oncogenic signaling (dark blue). The arrows (↓) show downstream activation and the inhibitory interactions are delineated by T-shaped (⊥) ends. A network map representing the p53 pathway is illustrated in the distant background.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbas T, Dutta A 2009. p21 in cancer: Intricate networks and multiple activities. Nat Rev Cancer 9:400–414 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abukhdeir AM, Park BH 2008. P21 and p27: Roles in carcinogenesis and drug resistance. Expert Rev Mol Med 10:e19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alhopuro P, Ylisaukko-Oja SK, Koskinen WJ, Bono P, Arola J, Jarvinen HJ, Mecklin JP, Atula T, Kontio R, Makitie AA, et al. 2005. The MDM2 promoter polymorphism SNP309T–>G and the risk of uterine leiomyosarcoma, colorectal cancer, and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Med Gen 42:694–698 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arva NC, Gopen TR, Talbott KE, Campbell LE, Chicas A, White DE, Bond GL, Levine AJ, Bargonetti J 2005. A chromatin-associated and transcriptionally inactive p53-Mdm2 complex occurs in mdm2 SNP309 homozygous cells. J Biol Chem 280:26776–26787 - PubMed
    1. Ashcroft M, Kubbutat MH, Vousden KH 1999. Regulation of p53 function and stability by phosphorylation. Molecular Cell Biol 19:1751–1758 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances