Factors at admission associated with bleeding risk in medical patients: findings from the IMPROVE investigators
- PMID: 20453069
- DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-3081
Factors at admission associated with bleeding risk in medical patients: findings from the IMPROVE investigators
Abstract
Background: Acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients are at risk of VTE. Despite guidelines for VTE prevention, prophylaxis use in these patients is still poor, possibly because of fear of bleeding risk. We used data from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) to assess in-hospital bleeding incidence and to identify risk factors at admission associated with in-hospital bleeding risk in acutely ill medical patients.
Methods: IMPROVE is a multinational, observational study that enrolled 15,156 medical patients. The in-hospital bleeding incidence was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. A multiple regression model analysis was performed to identify risk factors at admission associated with bleeding.
Results: The cumulative incidence of major and nonmajor in-hospital bleeding within 14 days of admission was 3.2%. Active gastroduodenal ulcer (OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 2.21-7.77), prior bleeding (OR, 3.64; 95% CI, 2.21-5.99), and low platelet count (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.84-6.18) were the strongest independent risk factors at admission for bleeding. Other bleeding risk factors were increased age, hepatic or renal failure, ICU stay, central venous catheter, rheumatic disease, cancer, and male sex. Using these bleeding risk factors, a risk score was developed to estimate bleeding risk.
Conclusions: We assessed the incidence of major and clinically relevant bleeding in a large population of hospitalized medical patients and identified risk factors at admission associated with in-hospital bleeding. This information may assist physicians in deciding whether to use mechanical or pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis.
Comment in
-
Can we IMPROVE bleeding risk assessment for acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients?Chest. 2011 Jan;139(1):10-3. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1127. Chest. 2011. PMID: 21208874 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Validation of the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism Bleeding Risk Score.Chest. 2016 Feb;149(2):372-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2842. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Chest. 2016. PMID: 26867833
-
External validation of the risk assessment model of the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) for medical patients in a tertiary health system.J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Nov 17;3(6):e001152. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001152. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014. PMID: 25404191 Free PMC article.
-
Can we IMPROVE bleeding risk assessment for acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients?Chest. 2011 Jan;139(1):10-3. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1127. Chest. 2011. PMID: 21208874 No abstract available.
-
Patient selection for thromboprophylaxis in medical inpatients.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013 Dec;11(12):1639-47. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2013.845525. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013. PMID: 24215194 Review.
-
Primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients.Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Feb;47(2):198-209. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R335. Epub 2013 Feb 5. Ann Pharmacother. 2013. PMID: 23386067 Review.
Cited by
-
A Prospective Observational Cohort of Clinical Outcomes in Medical Inpatients prescribed Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis Using Different Clinical Risk Assessment Models(COMPT RAMs).Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 4;9(1):18366. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54842-3. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31797897 Free PMC article.
-
Improved utilisation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in renal-impaired patients following a clinical pharmacist intervention.Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2022 Jan;29(1):40-43. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002030. Epub 2019 Dec 11. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2022. PMID: 34930793 Free PMC article.
-
[Clinical presentation of bleeding in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit : Organ systems and clinical implications].Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2021 Sep;116(6):482-490. doi: 10.1007/s00063-021-00845-w. Epub 2021 Aug 24. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2021. PMID: 34427697 Review. German.
-
Doctors Identify Hemorrhage Better during Chart Review when Assisted by Artificial Intelligence.Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):743-751. doi: 10.1055/a-2121-8380. Epub 2023 Jul 3. Appl Clin Inform. 2023. PMID: 37399838 Free PMC article.
-
External validation and update of the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism bleeding risk score for predicting bleeding in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: a retrospective single-center cohort study in Japan.Thromb J. 2024 Mar 28;22(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12959-024-00603-w. Thromb J. 2024. PMID: 38549086 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical