Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;20(10):2307-14.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1807-6. Epub 2010 May 9.

Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography?

Affiliations

Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography?

Chantal Van Ongeval et al. Eur Radiol. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate if the screening performance parameters of digital mammography (DM) in a decentralized screening organization were comparable with film-screen mammography (FSM).

Methods: A nationwide screening program was launched in 2001, and since 2005 screening with DM has been allowed. Firstly, the parameters of the three regional screening units (RSUs) that first switched to DM (11,355 women) were compared with the FSM period of the same three RSUs (23,325 women). Secondly, they were compared with the results of the whole central breast unit (CBU).

Results: The recall rate (RR) of the DM group in the initial round was 2.64% [2.40% for FSM (p = 0.43)] and in the subsequent round 1.20% [1.58% for FSM (p = 0.03)]. The cancer detection rate (CDR) was 0.59% for DM and 0.64% for FSM (p = 0.56). The percentage of ductal carcinoma in situ was 0.07% for DM and 0.16% for FSM (p = 0.02). The positive predictive value was high in the subsequent rounds (DM 48.00%, FSM 45.93%) and lower in the initial round (DM 24.05%, FSM 24.86%). Compared with the results of the whole CBU, DM showed no significant difference.

Conclusion: DM can be introduced in a decentralized screening organization with a high CDR without increasing the RR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur J Radiol. 2009 Jun;70(3):539-48 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2001 Mar;218(3):873-80 - PubMed
    1. Ann Oncol. 2003 Aug;14(8):1203-5 - PubMed
    1. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1-3):120-30 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 May 18;97(10):748-54 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources