Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography?
- PMID: 20455065
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1807-6
Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography?
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate if the screening performance parameters of digital mammography (DM) in a decentralized screening organization were comparable with film-screen mammography (FSM).
Methods: A nationwide screening program was launched in 2001, and since 2005 screening with DM has been allowed. Firstly, the parameters of the three regional screening units (RSUs) that first switched to DM (11,355 women) were compared with the FSM period of the same three RSUs (23,325 women). Secondly, they were compared with the results of the whole central breast unit (CBU).
Results: The recall rate (RR) of the DM group in the initial round was 2.64% [2.40% for FSM (p = 0.43)] and in the subsequent round 1.20% [1.58% for FSM (p = 0.03)]. The cancer detection rate (CDR) was 0.59% for DM and 0.64% for FSM (p = 0.56). The percentage of ductal carcinoma in situ was 0.07% for DM and 0.16% for FSM (p = 0.02). The positive predictive value was high in the subsequent rounds (DM 48.00%, FSM 45.93%) and lower in the initial round (DM 24.05%, FSM 24.86%). Compared with the results of the whole CBU, DM showed no significant difference.
Conclusion: DM can be introduced in a decentralized screening organization with a high CDR without increasing the RR.
Similar articles
-
Effect of Different Types of Mammography Equipment on Screening Outcomes: A Report by the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.Korean J Radiol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1638-1645. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0006. Korean J Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31854151 Free PMC article.
-
Does digital mammography increase detection of high-risk breast lesions presenting as calcifications?AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov;201(5):1148-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10195. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013. PMID: 24147490
-
Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program.Eur Radiol. 2019 Dec;29(12):6991-6999. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06264-y. Epub 2019 Jun 11. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31187221
-
Artifacts in digital mammography.JBR-BTR. 2008 Nov-Dec;91(6):262-3. JBR-BTR. 2008. PMID: 19203002 Review.
-
[Digital Mammography as a Screening Tool in Korea].Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2021 Jan;82(1):2-11. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0004. Epub 2021 Jan 31. Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2021. PMID: 36237465 Free PMC article. Review. Korean.
Cited by
-
Impact of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Population Screening: A Meta-Analysis.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jan 4;113(1):16-26. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa080. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021. PMID: 32572492 Free PMC article.
-
Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography.Eur Radiol. 2013 Oct;23(10):2891-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2876-0. Epub 2013 May 21. Eur Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23689308
-
Breast cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detectors.Eur Radiol. 2016 Mar;26(3):874-83. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3885-y. Epub 2015 Jun 25. Eur Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26105023 Free PMC article.
-
Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma.Radiology. 2013 Mar;266(3):743-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12121084. Epub 2012 Dec 6. Radiology. 2013. PMID: 23220903 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the digitalisation of mammography on performance parameters and breast dose in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme.Eur Radiol. 2014 Aug;24(8):1808-19. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3169-y. Epub 2014 May 10. Eur Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24816932
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical