Parameters for successful implant integration revisited part II: algorithm for immediate loading diagnostic factors
- PMID: 20455906
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00280.x
Parameters for successful implant integration revisited part II: algorithm for immediate loading diagnostic factors
Abstract
Immediate loading of dental implants has become a widely reported practice with success rates ranging from 70.8% to 100%. Although most studies have considered implant survival to be the only measure of success, a better definition includes the long-term stability of the hard and soft tissues around the implant(s) and other adjacent structures, as well as the long-term stability of all the restorative components. The parameters identified in 1981 by Albrektsson and colleagues as influencing the establishment and maintenance of osseointegration have been reconsidered in relation to immediate loading to improve the chances of achieving such success. Two of the six parameters (status of the bone/implant site and implant loading conditions) have preoperative diagnostic implications, whereas three (implant design, surgical technique, and implant finish) may compensate for less-than-ideal site and loading conditions. Factors affecting the outcome of immediate loading are reviewed to assist clinicians attempting to assess its risks and benefits.
Similar articles
-
Parameters for successful implant integration revisited part I: immediate loading considered in light of the original prerequisites for osseointegration.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 May;12 Suppl 1:e2-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00279.x. Epub 2010 Apr 23. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010. PMID: 20455902 Review.
-
The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review.J Dent. 2010 Aug;38(8):612-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.013. Epub 2010 Jun 11. J Dent. 2010. PMID: 20546821 Review.
-
Immediate functional loading of single-tooth TiO2 grit-blasted implant restoration. A controlled prospective study in a porcine model. Part II: Histology and histomorphometry.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Dec;9(4):207-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00039.x. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007. PMID: 18031442
-
Freestanding and multiunit immediate loading of the expandable implant: an up-to-40-month prospective survival study.J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Feb;85(2):148-55. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.113355. J Prosthet Dent. 2001. PMID: 11208204
-
Immediate loading of single SLA implants: drilling vs. osteotomes for the preparation of the implant site.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jan;19(1):55-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01422.x. Epub 2007 Oct 22. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008. PMID: 17956566
Cited by
-
Comparative assessment of the interfacial soft and hard tissues investing implants and natural teeth in the macaque mandible.Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jul;19(6):1353-62. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1362-7. Epub 2014 Nov 21. Clin Oral Investig. 2015. PMID: 25411082
-
Impact of immediately loaded implant-supported maxillary full-arch dental prostheses: a systematic review.J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Aug 12;27:e20180600. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0600. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019. PMID: 31411262 Free PMC article.
-
Successful soft and hard tissue augmentation with platelet-rich fibrin in combination with bovine bone space maintainer in a delayed implant placement protocol in the esthetic zone: A case report.Clin Case Rep. 2019 May 8;7(6):1185-1190. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2177. eCollection 2019 Jun. Clin Case Rep. 2019. PMID: 31183091 Free PMC article.
-
Five-Year Prospective Study on Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Remodeling Expected Using Bone Level Implants with Sandblasted/Acid-Etched Surface and Conical Connection.Eur J Dent. 2022 Oct;16(4):787-795. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739439. Epub 2022 Jan 6. Eur J Dent. 2022. PMID: 34991163 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources