Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;50(8):1806-14.
doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02650.x. Epub 2010 Apr 30.

Human immunodeficiency virus test-seeking blood donors in a large blood bank in São Paulo, Brazil

Affiliations

Human immunodeficiency virus test-seeking blood donors in a large blood bank in São Paulo, Brazil

Thelma Goncalez et al. Transfusion. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk behaviors are excluded from donation to reduce the risk of transfusion-transmitted infection. Persons donating to be tested for HIV may therefore deny risk behaviors.

Study design and methods: A random sample of donors completed a survey on motivations, knowledge, and attitudes on the screening process. Donors were considered test seekers if they agreed with two statements "I think that blood donation is a good, fast, and anonymous way to get my blood tested" and "I donate to get my test results." This study was conducted from June to November 2006 at the largest blood bank in São Paulo, Brazil.

Results: Of 3061 participants, 208 (7%) were test seekers. They tended to be male and had a lower educational level. They were more likely to have incorrect knowledge about blood safety (e.g., not knowing that a unit can test antibody negative and still transmit infection, 50% vs. 42%, p = 0.02), express dissatisfaction with screening questions (e.g., feeling that important questions were not asked, 14% vs. 5%, p < 0.01), and concur that donors do not answer questions truthfully (e.g., donors have more sexual partners than they admit, 29% vs. 18%, p < 0.01). Test seekers were more likely to believe that it is acceptable to donate blood to get tested for HIV (41% vs. 10%, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Test-seeking motivation, coupled with low knowledge of window period risk, is counter to improving blood safety and to donor prevention needs. Donor education needs to be improved along with availability of appropriate HIV counseling and testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO. Universal access to safe blood. [11 February, 2010]. Available at: http://www.who.int/bloodsafety/universalbts/en/index.html.
    1. WHO. Screening donated blood for transfusion-transmissible infections. [11 February, 2010]. Available at: http://www.who.int/bloodsafety/ScreeningDonatedBloodforTransfusion.pdf. - PubMed
    1. Schreiber GB, Busch MP, Kleinman SH, Korelitz JJ. The risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infections. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1685–90. - PubMed
    1. Barreto CC, Sabino EC, Goncalez TT, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and residual risk of human immunodeficiency virus among community and replacement first-time blood donors in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Transfusion. 2005;45:1709–14. - PubMed
    1. Stramer SL, Glynn SA, Kleinman SH, et al. Detection of HIV-1 and HCV infections among antibody-negative blood donors by nucleic acid-amplification testing. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:760–8. - PubMed

Publication types