A systematic review and meta-analysis on the therapeutic equivalence of statins
- PMID: 20456733
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01085.x
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the therapeutic equivalence of statins
Abstract
Background: Statins are the most commonly prescribed agents for hypercholesterolemia because of their efficacy and tolerability. As the number of patients in need of statin therapy continues to increase, information regarding the relative efficacy and safety of statins is required for decision-making.
Objective: This study will use systematic review to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of different statins at different doses and determine the therapeutically equivalent doses of statins to achieve a specific level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering effect.
Methods: Publications of head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of statins were retrieved from the Oregon state database (1966-2004), MEDLINE (2005-April of 2006), EMBASE (2005-April of 2006), and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry (up to the first quarter of 2006). The publications were evaluated with predetermined criteria by a reviewer before they were included in the review. The mean change in cholesterol level of each statin was calculated and weighted by number of subjects involved in each RCT. Where possible, meta-analysis was performed to generate pooled estimates of the cholesterol lowering effect of statins and the difference between statins.
Results: Seventy-five studies reporting RCTs of head-to-head comparisons on statins were included. Most studies had similar baseline characteristics, except the rosuvastatin related studies. A daily dose of atorvastatin 10 mg, fluvastatin 80 mg, lovastatin 40-80 mg, and simvastatin 20 mg could decrease LDL-C by 30-40%, and fluvastatin 40 mg, lovastatin 10-20 mg, pravastatin 20-40 mg, and simvastatin 10 mg could decrease LDL-C by 20-30%. The only two statins that could reduce LDL-C more than 40% were rosuvastatin and atorvastatin at a daily dose of 20 mg or higher. Meta-analysis indicated a statistically significant but clinically minor difference (<7%) between statins in cholesterol lowering effect. Comparisons of coronary heart disease prevention and safety could not be made because of insufficient data.
Conclusions: At comparable doses, statins are therapeutically equivalent in reducing LDL-C.
Similar articles
-
Dose-comparative effects of different statins on serum lipid levels: a network meta-analysis of 256,827 individuals in 181 randomized controlled trials.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):658-70. doi: 10.1177/2047487313483600. Epub 2013 Mar 25. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23529608
-
Pravastatin for lowering lipids.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 18;9(9):CD013673. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013673.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37721222 Free PMC article.
-
Chronotherapy versus conventional statins therapy for the treatment of hyperlipidaemia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 26;11(11):CD009462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009462.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27888640 Free PMC article.
-
Statins in hypercholesterolaemia: a dose-specific meta-analysis of lipid changes in randomised, double blind trials.BMC Fam Pract. 2003 Dec 1;4:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-4-18. BMC Fam Pract. 2003. PMID: 14969594 Free PMC article.
-
Fluvastatin for lowering lipids.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 6;3(3):CD012282. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012282.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29508377 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Which interventions offer best value for money in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease?PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041842. Epub 2012 Jul 23. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22844529 Free PMC article.
-
National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions.Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):1274-81. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300755. Epub 2012 May 17. Am J Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22594758 Free PMC article.
-
Statin use does not prevent recurrent adenomatous polyp formation in a VA population.Indian J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;29(3):106-11. doi: 10.1007/s12664-010-0032-1. Epub 2010 Jul 25. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 20658327
-
Efficacy of standard and intensive statin treatment for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in diabetes patients: a meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2014 Nov 5;9(11):e111247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111247. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25372483 Free PMC article.
-
Association between statin use and acute pulmonary embolism in intensive care unit patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 8;11:1369967. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1369967. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38651067 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous