Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jul-Sep;23(3):281-8; quiz 289.
doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Apr 24.

Reliability and validity of the multiaxis profile dynamometer with younger and older participants

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Reliability and validity of the multiaxis profile dynamometer with younger and older participants

Curt B Irwin et al. J Hand Ther. 2010 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Study design: Clinical Measurement.

Introduction: Grip strength has been administered for many years with a wide variety of instruments and for very different purposes.

Purpose of the study: To examine the reliability and validity of a new grip measurement device, the multiaxis profile (MAP) dynamometer, compared with the Baseline dynamometer (Fabrication Enterprises Inc., White Plains, NY) and vigorimeter.

Methods: Twenty-eight participants (<30 yr, n=14; and >65 yr, n=14) completed grip strength testing using all three devices. Measurements were obtained at baseline and one to two weeks later.

Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the MAP ranged from 0.94 to 0.99. The other two devices had ICCs of 0.95-0.98. Correlations among the MAP dynamometer, the Baseline dynamometer, and the vigorimeter were 0.78-0.90. The results indicate high concurrent validity among all the three devices and that all devices are reliable instruments to measure the grip strength of both younger and older adults.

Conclusions: In addition to measuring grip strength, the MAP dynamometer measures other grip-related information, such as grip force vectors, rate of force buildup, and force variability. This additional grip information may improve our understanding of hand function and changes because of aging.

Level of evidence: n/a.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A. Baseline Dynamometer and B. Vigorimeter
Figure 2
Figure 2
MAP with instrumented beams identified
Figure 3
Figure 3
Participant hand size determined how the 6.35 cm cover was segmented
Figure 4
Figure 4
Vector summation of the grip forces
Figure 5
Figure 5
Overall grip force vector with magnitude (F) and angle (θ)
Figure 6
Figure 6
Representative force profile illustrating the build-up and plateau phases

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mathiowetz V, Vizenor L, Melander D. Comparison of baseline instruments to the Jamar dynamometer and the B&L engineering pinch gauge. Occup Ther J Res. 2000;20:147–162.
    1. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength - normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:69–74. - PubMed
    1. Gunther CM, Burger A, Rickert M, Crispin A, Schulz CU. Grip strength in healthy Caucasian adults, reference values. J Hand Surg-Am Vol. 2008;33A:558–565. - PubMed
    1. Vlieland T, vanderWijk TP, Jolie IMM, Zwinderman AH, Hazes JMW. Determinants of hand function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1996;23:835–840. - PubMed
    1. Tremayne A, Taylor N, McBurney H, Baskus K. Correlation of impairment and activity limitation after wrist fracture. Physiother Res Int. 2002;7:90–99. - PubMed

Publication types