Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul 1;588(Pt 13):2487-501.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.186056. Epub 2010 May 10.

Effects of respiratory muscle work on blood flow distribution during exercise in heart failure

Affiliations

Effects of respiratory muscle work on blood flow distribution during exercise in heart failure

Thomas P Olson et al. J Physiol. .

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) patients have a reduced cardiac reserve and increased work of breathing. Increased locomotor muscle blood flow demand may result in competition between respiratory and locomotor vascular beds. We hypothesized that HF patients would demonstrate improved locomotor blood flow with respiratory muscle unloading during activity. Ten patients (ejection fraction = 31 +/- 3%) and 10 controls (CTL) underwent two cycling sessions (60% peak work). Session 1 (S1): 5 min of normal breathing (NB), 5 min respiratory muscle unloading with a ventilator, and 5 min of NB. Session 2 (S2): 5 min NB, 5 min of respiratory muscle loading with inspiratory resistance, and 5 min of NB. Measurements included: leg blood flow (LBF, thermodilution), cardiac output (Q), and oesophageal pressure (P(pl), index of pleural pressure). S1: P(pl) was reduced in both groups (HF: 73 +/- 8%; CTL: 60 +/- 13%, P < 0.01). HF: Q increased (9.6 +/- 0.4 vs. 11.3 +/- 0.8 l min(-1), P < 0.05) and LBF increased (4.8 +/- 0.8 vs. 7.3 +/- 1.1 l min(-1), P < 0.01); CTL: no changes in Q (14.7 +/- 1.0 vs. 14.8 +/- 1.6 l min(-1)) or LBF (10.9 +/- 1.8 vs. 10.3 +/- 1.7 l min(-1)). S2: P(pl) increased in both groups (HF: 172 +/- 16%, CTL: 220 +/- 40%, P < 0.01). HF: no change was observed in Q(10.0 +/- 0.4 vs. 10.3 +/- 0.8 l min(-1)) or LBF (5.0 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.7 +/- 0.5 l min(-1)); CTL: increased (15.4 +/- 1.4 vs. 16.9 +/- 1.5 l min(-1), P < 0.01) and LBF remained unchanged (10.7 +/- 1.5 vs. 10.3 +/- 1.8 l min(-1)). These data suggest HF patients preferentially steal blood flow from locomotor muscles to accommodate the work of breathing during activity. Further, HF patients are unable to vasoconstrict locomotor vascular beds beyond NB when presented with a respiratory load.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Influence of inspiratory pressure assistance and inspiratory loading on the pleural pressure volume response during steady-state exercise
A, inspiratory assistance in CTL participants. B, inspiratory assistance in HF patients. C, inspiratory loading in CTL participants. D, inspiratory loading in HF patients. Baseline measurements represent an average of the normal breathing under room air conditions before and after the experimental condition.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Influence of inspiratory pressure assistance and inspiratory loading on pulmonary pressures during steady-state exercise
Figures represent absolute values over time for all exercise conditions. * indicates a significant difference between the HF and CTL groups (P < 0.05), # indicates a significant difference from the preceding exercise condition within the CTL group (P < 0.05), and † indicates a significant difference from the preceding exercise condition within the HF group (P < 0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Influence of inspiratory pressure assistance and inspiratory loading on leg blood flow and haemodynamics during steady-state exercise
Figures represent absolute values over time for all exercise conditions. * indicates a significant difference between the HF and CTL groups (P < 0.05), # indicates a significant difference from the preceding exercise condition within the CTL group (P < 0.05), and † indicates a significant difference from the preceding exercise condition within the HF group (P < 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Influence of inspiratory pressure assistance and inspiratory loading on cardiovascular haemodynamics during steady-state exercise
Figures represent absolute values over time for all exercise conditions. * indicates a significant difference between the HF and CTL groups (P < 0.05), # indicates a significant difference from the preceding exercise condition within the CTL group (P < 0.05), and † indicates a significant difference from the preceding exercise condition within the HF group (P < 0.05).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Relationship between the percentage change in mean inspiratory Ppl and the percentage change in LBF/ during the transition from baseline exercise to inspiratory assistance in the HF patients
This relationship demonstrates the impact of a reduction in the work of breathing on LBF in HF patients.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aaron EA, Seow KC, Johnson BD, Dempsey JA. Oxygen cost of exercise hyperpnea: implications for performance. J Appl Physiol. 1992;72:1818–1825. - PubMed
    1. Agostoni PG, Bussotti M, Palermo P, Guazzi M. Does lung diffusion impairment affect exercise capacity in patients with heart failure. Heart. 2002;88:453–459. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen P, Saltin B. Maximal perfusion of skeletal muscle in man. J Physiol. 1985;366:233–249. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck KC, Hyatt RE, Mpougas P, Scanlon PD. Evaluation of pulmonary resistance and maximal expiratory flow measurements during exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86:1388–1395. - PubMed
    1. Borghi-Silva A, Carrascosa C, Oliveira CC, Barroco AC, Berton DC, Vilaca D, Lira-Filho EB, Ribeiro D, Nery LE, Neder JA. Effects of respiratory muscle unloading on leg muscle oxygenation and blood volume during high-intensity exercise in chronic heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;294:H2465–H2472. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms