Assessing non-response to a mailed health survey including self-collection of biological material
- PMID: 20457781
- PMCID: PMC3139099
- DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq053
Assessing non-response to a mailed health survey including self-collection of biological material
Abstract
Background: Collection of biological material via mailed health surveys is an emerging trend. This study was conducted to assess non-response bias in a study of sexually transmitted infection utilizing self-collected, home-obtained specimens.
Methods: Data from a nationwide administrative database on health care utilization together with data from a research study were used. The research study was an outreach screening programme including home-obtained, participant-collected, mail-delivered testing for Chlamydia trachomatis. A random sample of 1690 persons aged 18-35 years from the population registry was selected. Study materials (specimen collection kit, informed consent, questionnaire) were mailed in three waves.
Results: The first mailing yielded a response rate of 18.5% (n = 259), the second 10.1% (n = 141) and the third 11.4% (n = 160). Women were more likely to respond than men, and responders were less likely to have had medical care in the past year and more likely to have had a prior sexually transmitted infection than non-responders. Chlamydia trachomatis infection rates tended to be higher in early responders. Late responders appeared more like non-responders in terms of demographic factors, health care utilization patterns and potential disease status.
Conclusion: Non-response in a health survey including biological material self-collection warrants research as it may differ from non-response in general health questionnaires.
Similar articles
-
Mailed urine samples are not an effective screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis case finding among young men.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007 Jul;21(6):789-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02088.x. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007. PMID: 17567309
-
Improving Chlamydia trachomatis retesting rates by mailed self-collection kit.Sex Health. 2011 Jun;8(2):248-50. doi: 10.1071/SH10064. Sex Health. 2011. PMID: 21592441
-
Postal urine specimens: are they a feasible method for genital chlamydial infection screening?Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):455-8. Br J Gen Pract. 1999. PMID: 10562745 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiological, social, diagnostic and economic evaluation of population screening for genital chlamydial infection.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(8):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-165. doi: 10.3310/hta11080. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17311735 Review.
-
Advances in sampling and screening for chlamydia.Future Microbiol. 2013 Mar;8(3):367-86. doi: 10.2217/fmb.13.3. Future Microbiol. 2013. PMID: 23464373 Review.
Cited by
-
Patterns of item nonresponse behaviour to survey questionnaires are systematic and associated with genetic loci.Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Aug;7(8):1371-1387. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01632-7. Epub 2023 Jun 29. Nat Hum Behav. 2023. PMID: 37386106 Free PMC article.
-
Rationale, design, and profile of the Three-Prefecture Cohort in Japan: A 15-year follow-up.J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;27(4):193-199. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.05.003. Epub 2017 Jan 5. J Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28142030 Free PMC article.
-
From hybrid to fully remote clinical trial amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Strategies to promote recruitment, retention, and engagement in a randomized mHealth trial.Digit Health. 2022 Sep 25;8:20552076221129065. doi: 10.1177/20552076221129065. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2022. PMID: 36185388 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of Monitoring Health and Well-being in Emerging Adults: Pilot Longitudinal Cohort Study.JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jan 6;6(1):e30027. doi: 10.2196/30027. JMIR Form Res. 2022. PMID: 34989696 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of factors associated with patient-reported outcome (PRO) score completion rate one year after shoulder surgeries.JSES Int. 2023 Sep 14;8(1):204-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.08.008. eCollection 2024 Jan. JSES Int. 2023. PMID: 38312294 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Martikainen P, Laaksonen M, Piha K, Lallukka T. Does survey non-response bias the association between occupational social class and health? Scand J Public Health. 2007;35:212–5. - PubMed
-
- Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, et al. Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):MR000008. - PubMed
-
- Lahaut VM, Jansen HA, van de Mheen D, et al. Estimating non-response bias in a survey on alcohol consumption, comparison of response waves. Alcohol. 2003;38:128–34. - PubMed
-
- Filion F. Exploring and correcting for nonresponse bias using follow-ups of nonrespondents. Pacific Sociol Rev. 1976;19:401–8.
-
- Paganini-Hill A, Hsu G, Chao A, Ross KR. Comparison of early and late respondents to a postal health survey questionnaire. Epidemiology. 1993;4:375–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous